• whereitsat@lemmy.zipEnglish
    27·
    7 hours ago

    you found the one location where there’s a fat guy and four fit women.

    too bad real life doesn’t have achievements like steam does.

      • boonhet@lemmy.zipEnglish
        10·
        4 hours ago

        Arm is obscuring how big the stomach is but there are signs.

        Source: I can tell from some of the pixels and from having been quite fat in my time

        • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
          12·
          3 hours ago

          Definitely staged. What wife, upon discovering she’s being cheated on, finds two friends to help her make a humourous sign like this, and then waits for them to be at McDonald’s?

          As for everything else? Who knows. These women do look more attractive than this man from behind, but it’s hard to judge the entirety of a person from a picture, even if it’s a good picture. I’ve seen less attractive people with more attractive people (though usually not multiple). There’s a lot of ways to be attractive besides just looks.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zipEnglish
    48·
    9 hours ago

    At least have the decency to take your sidepiece out to eat some place classy like Little Caesar’s.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    20·
    9 hours ago

    All 4 women look hot yet he looks like a sack of potatoes. How. I’m used to hot guys acting like assholes and average guys being the better partner. This guy is a glitch in the matrix?

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netEnglish
      8·
      9 hours ago

      All 4 women look hot thin yet he looks like a sack of potatoes (fat).

      Fixed that for you. Hope that helps clear things up.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
        3·
        8 hours ago

        I mean, hotness is subjective. It’s fairly normal to find physically fit people attractive, and there’s nothing really inherently wrong about that. Plenty of people also find heavier set people attractive, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that either.

    • ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2·
      7 hours ago

      maybe my standards are skewed, dude has no cankles, no back boobs, no bingo wings and at least the remains of a haircut

      cmon this is a Mcdicks, not a bistro on the Rue du Plat

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    66·
    12 hours ago

    AI? The text on the sign looks off to me. I hate how I can’t just enjoy funny pictures anymore. Every fucking image needs to be scrutinized.

        • Zannsolo@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          6 hours ago

          I have zero issue with people expressing themselves sexually in relationships that aren’t non Monogamous, but eople should be in the loop on what kind of relationship you’re in with them.

          I personally wouldn’t want to be in a non-monogamous relationship. Even when I was single I didn’t like dating multiple girls at the same time.

          When I meet my wife I had been on a few dates with someone and had a date planned for the next day. The person I had been seeing called off our date morning of and that’s when I asked my coworker who introduced us to give her my number.

          I’ve had FWBs but didn’t date others while we were hooking up. Was down to hangout and have sex with them but not build a romantic relationship but I was still monogamous with them and all I asked is they give me the choice of they start sleeping with someone else

        • Glytch@lemmy.worldEnglish
          23·
          9 hours ago

          Making a lot of assumptions here.

          The women standing in this picture could be in a polycule situation with the dude at the table and he could be stepping out on all of them with the seated woman. It could be a group of single women playing a mean-spirited prank on their friend’s lame first date. It could also be completely fake and made for attention.

          I know there are a lot of monogamous people out there who talk shit about polyamory, largely out of ignorance or envy, but there’s no need to mirror that energy back at them. It won’t change their minds or stop the shit talk and it just increases the level of negativity surrounding the conversation. Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.

          • Glytch@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            5 hours ago

            Wtf is that sus link?

            Have you considered the third possibility that I mentioned? That it might be fake and for attention?

            the sexual liberal partner

            You’re aware that polyamorous relationships require clear communication and boundaries to not become abusive, correct? Just like monogamous ones do? From your word choice when talking about a potential cheater, I’m getting the impression that you don’t actually know what a healthy relationship is let alone what a healthy polyamorous relationship is.

            …but judging by your other responses in this thread a productive conversation is not in the offing, so I’ll just end my part of it here and wish you a good day.

            • Spot@startrek.websiteEnglish
              14·
              9 hours ago

              That link shows a chicken with pigtails?

              Anyway… being poly isn’t a bad thing. Being poly and lying to a partner that your monogamous, kinda is. If one party of a relationship changes their mind after commitments are made, the other party should be made aware before anything is acted on. If not, they are a lying piece of shit that can’t be trusted. Pretending to be monogamous just to trick someone into a relationship until your bored with them, despicable.

              Edit, lost my last word on posting.

                • Spot@startrek.websiteEnglish
                  3·
                  7 hours ago

                  How much media that is put out is just because people engage with scandalous shit? If people didn’t, we might not have had to deal with reality shows or viral media apps. Of course there will be people using social media that want to be part of that. Sex and scandals sell.

                  I do think it’s odd that you think that me sharing my own views is patronizing you. I just gave my 2cents, from my personal experience, relating to cheating partners. Not all cheaters are poly, seen many cheaters choose a monogamous relationship later in life. They were just too cowardly to be open and honest with their partner(s) or worse (in my opinion), openly lied to a partner about their cheating. Some were poly, and it was a realization they were aiming for a relationship they didn’t really want, but had been raised by a society that said they did, and had tried to believe it. Does not excuse the cheating though.

                  My real only point is/was: Whatever your sexual preferences are, lying to an intimate partner about who you are intimate with is a shit move, and makes that liar shitty.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
                  2·
                  8 hours ago

                  I don’t even know what you are trying to claim? You keep linking to a wiki article that just lists the status of legal polygamy in different countries and hoping people draw the same conclusions you have.

                  You also keep claiming that the man being accused of cheating is sexually liberal just because he has chosen to cheat, but I think that you would have to assume that he didn’t expect his partner to be A monogamist for him to be actually liberal about sex and not just an asshole.

                  Countries with legal Polygamy can still utilize social shaming and the law to sexually oppress their partners. In fact some of those states have some of the most severe punishments for infidelity on the planet, and they are typically hyper patriarchal and have laws only utilized against women.

                  You can’t be sexually liberal while still expecting your partner to practice monogamy.

        • pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          18·
          9 hours ago

          There is nothing wrong in wanting sexual exclusivity, in the same way there is nothing wrong in wanting more than one partner.
          Seeing either as “oppression” is limited mindset.

            • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.worldEnglish
              8·
              9 hours ago

              “I linked you a paper please agree”

              Lmao. You scream about liberation yet you’re the one wanting to control other people’s relationships.

                • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                  1·
                  3 hours ago

                  reread what, your comments about how not wanting a partner to cheat on you somehow equals sexual oppression? wouldn’t policing what kind of relationships people are allowed to have (aka what you’re trying to do) be closer to domineering?

            • pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              2·
              7 hours ago

              As a polyero, would you start a relationship with someone that wants a monogamous relationship?

                • pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                  3·
                  5 hours ago

                  Yeah but it’s too much redpilled jargon to be understood by a simple mortal like me. So I’ll leave you to it since it’s starting to sound a lot like “anyone that doesn’t have my specific and niche point of view is an enemy and must be educated” and I don’t feel like being educated by someone that uses this amount of emoticons

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
              3·
              8 hours ago

              Law that is used to litigate the divorce industry.

              That’s a broken link, but am I correct in assuming that you are claiming the high rate of divorce in the US compared to countries that practice polygamy is due to some kind of expectation of monogamy and not due to something like the legality of no fault divorce?

              • alapakala@quokk.auEnglish
                1·
                7 hours ago

                broken link

                I am claiming these sexual oppressors profit through litigations, not dishonesty & contract litigations. The spectacle is clearly captioned as “McCheating on my wife,” and not “McLying to my [sexually liberated] partner.” Let’s not deny there are profit incentives in these relationships.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
                  4·
                  7 hours ago

                  Is it sexual oppression if both parties consented to the relationship being predicated on monogamy?

                  “McCheating on my wife,” and not “McLying to my [sexually liberated] partner.”

                  Again, I’m a bit confused on what your definition of sexually liberated really means.

                  Let’s not deny there are profit incentives in these relationships

                  I don’t think many relationships are started with profit incentive on their mind. Plus, no one in the US can force you to agree to a monogamist marriage if you didn’t first agree to it.

          • alapakala@quokk.auEnglish
            1·
            7 hours ago

            Never.
            That shaming culture is alive and well in 21c, and Monogamous domineers exist, still.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
              4·
              7 hours ago

              I don’t think anyone was trying to claim shaming culture wasn’t still around. I’m not sure what all entails to your use of the term monogamous domineers.

              Is the wife domineering over the husband by divorcing him? Wouldn’t that just allow him to be sexually liberated to sleep with whom he wants?

              What is the alternative in this scenario? For the man to continue being sexually liberal and force his wife to either adopt his views or be in a relationship structure she does not consent too?

              • alapakala@quokk.auEnglish
                1·
                6 hours ago

                The wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?

                What is the alternative in this scenario?

                I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
                  3·
                  6 hours ago

                  wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?

                  Again, I never made the argument that shame culture wasn’t widely prevalent, influential, or good.

                  I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?

                  This comment was made before you specified your criticism was about the concept and not aimed solely a particular individual in this example.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.todayEnglish
              3·
              7 hours ago

              Also, I’m not the one down voting your responses. I’m not trying to be overly critical, I think you have a unique perspective and I’m just trying to comprehend fully what you are trying to say.