Also, I’m not the one down voting your responses. I’m not trying to be overly critical, I think you have a unique perspective and I’m just trying to comprehend fully what you are trying to say.
Eh, out of all political, social economic, and environmental issues we have today total sexual autonomy isn’t very high on the priority list. It’s more of a secondary issue to our patriarchal social hierarchy imo.
I don’t think anyone was trying to claim shaming culture wasn’t still around. I’m not sure what all entails to your use of the term monogamous domineers.
Is the wife domineering over the husband by divorcing him? Wouldn’t that just allow him to be sexually liberated to sleep with whom he wants?
What is the alternative in this scenario? For the man to continue being sexually liberal and force his wife to either adopt his views or be in a relationship structure she does not consent too?
The wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?
What is the alternative in this scenario?
I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?
wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?
Again, I never made the argument that shame culture wasn’t widely prevalent, influential, or good.
I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?
This comment was made before you specified your criticism was about the concept and not aimed solely a particular individual in this example.
keep on educating yourself on dominant state monogamist enforcement oppressions
Again… When have I defended the action of the state?
leave my sexually liberated polycule alone.
I haven’t even been critical of your sexual inclusivity, nor would I want to do anything to your relationships? I don’t even think the state should really be involved in how we organize our relationships. Short of that happening, I think the state should expand legal benefits/protections to anyone who wants them.
Never.
That shaming culture is alive and well in 21c, and Monogamous domineers exist, still.
Also, I’m not the one down voting your responses. I’m not trying to be overly critical, I think you have a unique perspective and I’m just trying to comprehend fully what you are trying to say.
Ah. Learn some anarchism.
I think that’s a bit patronizing, total sexual inclusivity is not a very large focus of anarchist literature as a whole.
In fact, Murray Bookchin is one of my favorite political writers.
Then keep on reading more anarchist writings on what it means to have total sexual autonomy, and total relationship agencies.
Unlike statists, I don’t use cops to maintain my autonomies and agency.
Eh, out of all political, social economic, and environmental issues we have today total sexual autonomy isn’t very high on the priority list. It’s more of a secondary issue to our patriarchal social hierarchy imo.
I don’t think anyone was trying to claim shaming culture wasn’t still around. I’m not sure what all entails to your use of the term monogamous domineers.
Is the wife domineering over the husband by divorcing him? Wouldn’t that just allow him to be sexually liberated to sleep with whom he wants?
What is the alternative in this scenario? For the man to continue being sexually liberal and force his wife to either adopt his views or be in a relationship structure she does not consent too?
The wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?
I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?
Again, I never made the argument that shame culture wasn’t widely prevalent, influential, or good.
This comment was made before you specified your criticism was about the concept and not aimed solely a particular individual in this example.
Then keep on educating yourself on dominant state monogamist enforcement oppressions, and leave my sexually liberated polycule alone. Mcpisce?
Again… When have I defended the action of the state?
I haven’t even been critical of your sexual inclusivity, nor would I want to do anything to your relationships? I don’t even think the state should really be involved in how we organize our relationships. Short of that happening, I think the state should expand legal benefits/protections to anyone who wants them.