reread what, your comments about how not wanting a partner to cheat on you somehow equals sexual oppression? wouldn’t policing what kind of relationships people are allowed to have (aka what you’re trying to do) be closer to domineering?
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 19th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•I was a week away from buying a Pixel Pro 10 for GrapheneOS
0·3 months agoiOS has their own attestation/anti-tamper api similar to google’s integrity api so that’s going to be used instead. the only difference is that on iOS you’ll need to download extra software specifically for this.
graphene devs said you can do it with their sandboxed version of gms but as far as i know that still involves having an account and handing over all your personal info to google.
ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux
0·5 months agooudated and unmaintained software… like openrc, with a commit 3 weeks ago? or dinit with a commit 3 days ago?

they police that the guy is lying to his wife and having a secret relationship behind her back, and they’re very right to police that. cheating on a person you supposedly love for life is vile and disgusting and the wife has every right to be upset that her husband is secretly pursuing romantic partners behind her back (and judging by the sitting woman’s expression, she likely doesn’t know, so he’s likely hiding his marriage from her too).
is posing with a sign in public and making a scene distasteful? yeah, might be. but it’s nowhere as bad as cheating.
that’s also assuming that the situation is real, which i doubt. but it applies to all cheaters in general regardless of this specific image.