• Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s really not ok.

      If FOSS is going to make headway in business and among the non-technical, names should be descriptive and not based on some edgy humor a dev thinks is high comedy.

      • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Like “plasma”?

        Yeah names is important, but come on, Blender?

        Gimp is only a problemi for an handfull of english speaker americans. 90% of people in the world dont care.

      • fratermus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If the name were the problem then why doesn’t someone fork the project and change only the name? <- actual question, not trying to be a smartass

        In either case they are starting from ~zero name recognition.

        • yoevli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          “Git” is only really a word in British English which implicitly gives it lower worldwide cultural penetration than a general English term. For most non-British programmers (and honestly I would imagine many British ones given how ubiquitous Git VC is now), “Git” refers to the software first and the pejorative second, if they’ve even heard of the latter before.