You sicko perverts disgust me! You ruined my lesbian hucow session! Now I’ll never lactate!
You must log in or # to comment.
Honestly the only good thing about the UK banning step porn is that with any luck I can stop muting my porn. Seriously when they call each other bro, sis, mom or anything I get a soft-off.
You want a real answer?
I don’t give a shit about the “siblings” part. Half the time its on mute. Those videos just tend to have a setting I prefer with actresses who are way less doped up on plastic than a lot of other stuff.
Its basically the same idea as “amature” with actual camera work instead if a handicam on a tripod positioned 3 rooms away while ants fuck.
It’s just SEO crap.
Add two words to the filming process and you get like seven additional hashtags. Basically it’s the direct result of profit incentive lol.
I wish there was like, a way to specify a tag blacklist in your browser that will apply to all relevant sites even if you aren’t logged in or don’t have an account on those sites
Or porn sites should just let you exclude terms like regular search engines. “-step”, done.
I hate it. Drop the “step” you cowards!
That’s also really weird. As if that makes it quasi-incest. No, it’s still just plain incest.
Legally it does make all the difference.
Depends on the country.
Only PIV sex is illegal for related people over here.
Anything else (anal, oral etc.) is a-OK for related people because there is no risk of children being conceived.
In the US, if the actors were related, then that would be illegal. The characters being related is totally immaterial, though. If it was relevant, then certain scenes in Game of Thrones would have been illegal. The law says nothing about fictional siblings getting it on, just real ones.
Payment processors, on the other hand, care a lot.
getting there, one step at a time
We need less step shit and more trans lesbian porn imo. All the best trans girls are straight 😞
Huh?
All know is the shark is thinking of the autism creature
So is op calling the commenter autistic?
There are so many of us. 🥺
Some of us straights are super weirded out by it too. It’s either that or mean and I for one don’t find either of those things sexy.
Vanilla gang rise up
Mannn I just want to see two (or more) people who are super into each other clearly having fun. Is that too much to ask for?
Clearly
Is vanilla praxis?
Are whips and chains bourgeois decadence?
Porn itself is a lifestyle choice. There are dozens of people who live quite happily without porn.
Sexuality is also a gigantic sliding scale. And I would rather have gooners than incels.
It is rather odd, 10, 15 years ago it was a thing but not the thing, now it is like a big percentage of all porn. And all porn is a very big thing, the internet is like over 50% porn thank god. Or thanks somebody. But 10 to 15 years ago it was like Russian porn sites that were doing the step incest thing, now it’s everyone. Go figure I don’t know.
10-15 years ago was 2011-2016 amigo
There was plenty of that stuff in the American porn scene by then
The “what are you doing stepbro?” joke originated in that period, which inherently necessitated market saturation of that type of porn to work as a mainstream joke
Easy setting that barely required a studio plus the rise of amateur/indie videos. It was expected tbh.
Bold of you to assume there is no gay step porn.
Oh no, step-gay, I’m stuck in a washing machine!
I forgot the number but one of the rules of the internet is that whatever kind of weird kink you can think of it already exists on the internet. 56 is it? That’s the only number of the rule of the internet I know
34!
No 34 states that if it exists or can be imagined there is porn of it 35 is if there is none, it will be made
And finally 36 is no matter what it is it’s someone fetish
It’s 36
I am not straight, nor do I have siblings. Rationally I don’t really see why there would be an issue with siblings having sex recreationally without producing children, which wouldn’t even be an issue with step siblings. With step parents the age difference might also be acceptable.
Someone recently posted a Wikipedia link to an effect where people growing up together don’t feel sexual attraction to each other, which is the primary reason why I assume it is a taboo (I used to think it was because of the negative health effects for incestuous children), but so long as all involved parties consent I see no issue.
With step parents the age difference might also be acceptable.
Excuse me, what? You’re not insinuating it would be ok for a step-parent to have sex with their step-child, are you?
It would be weird and fucked up, possibly abusive.
But if it’s abusive, it’s already illegal and no sexual act should be illegal just because I consider it weird.
Might even be unconstitutional to make sex between (adult) step-parents and their children illegal but I’m not sure.
Yeah, there are uncomfortable power dynamics at play for those roles
Wait, why exactly? I can see it being a problem in some cases but I wouldn’t assume that it is generally a problem. The way I see it it is just two people who are loved ones of a common other (which is not uncommon in polyamorous relationships as far as I know) and the power dynamics would be dependent on those relationships, of which I would assume there is no inherently more powerful one.
The acceptable age ranges do imply something icky between the parent and step parent though.
I should also note that I have not had step parents or children at any point in my life so far and may be unaware of otherwise obvious things.
Yeah! It’s inherently abusive because of those power dynamics.
For me feels like 1000 years little girl on anime that is sexualized, just a way yo “white wash” taboo kinks.
