UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agoThe Un(Rule)lenting Goonpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1181file-text
arrow-up1181imageThe Un(Rule)lenting Goonpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square42linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoIt would be weird and fucked up, possibly abusive. But if it’s abusive, it’s already illegal and no sexual act should be illegal just because I consider it weird. Might even be unconstitutional to make sex between (adult) step-parents and their children illegal but I’m not sure.
minus-squarevelma@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·54 minutes agoThere’s plenty of abuse that isn’t strictly illegal. It’s unethical. Look at Woody Allen.
It would be weird and fucked up, possibly abusive.
But if it’s abusive, it’s already illegal and no sexual act should be illegal just because I consider it weird.
Might even be unconstitutional to make sex between (adult) step-parents and their children illegal but I’m not sure.
There’s plenty of abuse that isn’t strictly illegal.
It’s unethical.
Look at Woody Allen.