I’m guessing there’s an error somewhere, because this doesn’t seem possible.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Lazy copy paste, no guarantee any of this is right because I’m on mobile:

      Nutrition Facts

      Valeur nutritive

      Per 4 tsp (60 g)

      pour 4 c. à thé (60 g)

      Calories 440

      Fat / Lipides 43 g

      Saturated / saturés7 g

      % Daily Value* % valeur quotidienne*

      57%

      38%

      + Trans / trans 0.5 g

      Carbohydrate / Glucides 10 g

      Fibre / Fibres 5 g

      Sugars / Sucres 2 g

      18%

      2%

      Protein/Protéines 4 g

      Cholesterol / Cholestérol 0 mg

      Sodium 680 mg

      Potassium 250 mg

      Calcium 30 mg

      30%

      5%

      2%

      14%

      Iron / Fer 2.5mg

      • 5% or less is a little, 15% or more is a lot
      • 5% ou moins c’est peu, 15% ou plus c’est beaucoup
  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oil is the thing you want to carry when you’re though-hiking and you want max calories/lb of weight carried. Obviously you can’t eat only oil but you can use it to make oil-heavy dishes such as spaghetti aglio e olio.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oil 43g x 9 kcal/g = 387 kcal. Carbs 40 g x 4 kcal/g = 160 kcal. Protein 4 g x 4 kcal/g = 16 kcal. Total 387+160+16 = 563 kcal. Definitely different. Could it be that oil is 34 and not 43 g? With the oil actually ubeing a tad under the rule-of-thumb 9 kcal/g this might then add up.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hey OP. I think those numbers are based off the 60grams not the 4tsp.

    4tsp of olive oil is 18 grams. 60grams of olive oil would be about 500 calories. I would assume they weight similar.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Grams are a measure of weight (well, mass if you want to be really specific). Tablespoons are a measure of volume. In order to do a proper comparison you need to know density.

          Because metric plans things nicely, a gram is one milliliter of water. 4 tbsp is 59.15ml. So… Yeah, pretty damn close to 60, but again that’s when working with water. I would imagine chili flakes are a little less dense and might throw that calculation off a bit.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s my thought too, although 4tbsp would be a pretty hefty serving size so I’m betting their mistake was using tbsp when converging to grams (when they meant to use tsp) and then it’s likely correct from there.

  • Mitchie151@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    The wildest part of Lao Gan Ma is sodium if you ask me. Some of the Chinese import ones are over 1000mg per serve, though the domestically made ones are a bit healthier. That said, you’re probably not using 4 tsp of the stuff in most things.

    • scytale@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      probably not using 4 tsp of the stuff in most things

      That’s hard when putting it on rice. So addicting, but yes, not good.

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I remember reading somewhere that uranium is calorie dense.

    So if you’re trying to bulk up, have a lil’ uranium snack. As a treat!