Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhat would you change?media.piefed.socialimagemessage-square195linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageWhat would you change?media.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square195linkfedilink
minus-squareLian Dynn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoFedora isn’t based ln RHEL, it was before, but now it’s in fact the opposite. As far as I know, RHEL 10 is based on CentOS Stream 10, which in turn is based on Fedora 41.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoThat’s correct. The community threw a fit when CentOS moved into that Stream position. Despite it being ABI compatible with RHEL.
minus-squareItdidnttrickledown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoI didn’t throw a fit I just replaced it within two months with debian and life goes on.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoCongrats? Enjoy your totally different ecosystem and lack of SELinux.
minus-squareItdidnttrickledown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoSomehow I’ve managed to get through okay. It might have something to do with competence.
Fedora isn’t based ln RHEL, it was before, but now it’s in fact the opposite. As far as I know, RHEL 10 is based on CentOS Stream 10, which in turn is based on Fedora 41.
That’s correct. The community threw a fit when CentOS moved into that Stream position. Despite it being ABI compatible with RHEL.
I didn’t throw a fit I just replaced it within two months with debian and life goes on.
Congrats? Enjoy your totally different ecosystem and lack of SELinux.
Somehow I’ve managed to get through okay. It might have something to do with competence.