• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What would you change?

    RedHat’s a corporation, and so move it to the right a couple squares, above Ubuntu. And move Windows up one.

    And I’d add:

    [PS, Sorry, I got carried away… ’ Originally intended to mention less than a couple dozen. LOL. Oops.]

    • Slackware
    • CRUX
    • KISS (and/or) Carbs
    • Venom
    • BedrockLinux (What I use, since it was new.)
    • Midnight BSD
    • DragonFly BSD
    • SuSe
    • OpenSuse
    • NixOs
    • GuixSD
    • PuppyLinux
    • Void Linux
    • PCLinuxOS
    • TinyCoreLinux
    • ALT Linux
    • OpenBSD
    • ReactOS
    • Debian Hurd
    • Guix Hurd
    • Ironclad
    • Kolibrios
    • Slitaz
    • Redox
    • Illumos
    • Oracle Solaris
    • Open Solaris
    • BeOs
    • Plan9
    • 9Front
    • LFS
    • Side GNU/Linux
    • NetBSD
    • OpenBSD
    • Milis Linux
    • Pisi Linux
    • RED OS
    • Vine Linux
    • RISC OS
    • Exherbo Linux
    • BusyBox+Linux
    • BusyBox+Linux+Suckless
    • Crunchbang Linux
    • ShredOS
    • REDOX OS
    • Menuet OS
    • OpenIndiana
    • UNIX
    • IRIX
    • Nekoware
    • Android
    • GrapheneOS
    • Illumos
    • Tribblix
    • OmniOS
    • Alpine Linux
    • GhostBSD
    • NomadBSD
    • Witch (my own, abandoned/dormant since 2016
    • MikeOS
    • Pluto (a kernel written in zig)
    • Amiga
    • AROS
    • MS DOS
    • Free DOS
    • Altair DOS
    • RemixOS
    • Sailfish OS
    • Sinclair BASIC
    • Xerox
    • SkyOS
    • DNIX
    • MINIX
    • Darwin
    • TrueOS
    • SerenityOS
    • Plurix
    • Inferno
    • Eros
    • Mach
    • V
    • Singularity
    • HelenOS
    • Harmony
    • Oberon
    • Sinclair QDOS
    • AtheOS
    • BareMetalOS
    • HOS
    • DreamberdOS
    • GNU Emacs ;)
    • TempleOS

    Though I’m not sure where they’d all go. And many of these would have to double up in lib-left. And/or split up the chart into more squares.

    And I’d cross-post to a political compass lemmy community. ;)

  • waz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    linux mint, but Debian edition, i feel is left of the centre split, but only a bit.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ubuntu was devised pretty much as Linux for workstations, with Canonical selling support. Personal use was more of a side effect.

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Debian is also the opposite of corporate since it’s a community project where the community aspect is central with democratic voting and no corporate control.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So then why would Microsoft be lower than Chrome or Apple with corporate? I wouldn’t say Windows has more democratic voting and less corporate control than them

          Also with 70% of computers running windows, the chart would be scaled terribly along the x axis. You would have to shift every Linux to box 1 with chrome, and put Mac in box 2/6

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Windows (either 11 or 10) needs to be in the top right corner. MacOS should be one notch down vertically. Ubuntu and mint both move one notch right. Cachy moves one notch left. Gentoo moves two to the right.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am not sure I understand your logic behind Cachy and Gentoo. Cachy is actually quite mainstream now and Gentoo is… less so.

      I think there’s just not enough tiles here. FreeBSD is definitely more mainstream than Haiku, but less so than Gentoo, let alone Arch.

    • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Helps if you know that command/setup thing/whatever you wanna call it. Otherwise, for someone who doesn’t know about it, the process can be pretty painful. Even with the wiki’s install instructions I have not been able to install arch the few times I tried in a VM over the past few months.

  • mmmm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d put Haiku on the extreme top left corner (or in one of the two rows below that first column) since it’s based on BeOS - it’s a corporate OS wether it exits or not and it intends to replicate said corporate OS. In its place I’d put either TempleOS or Plan9.

    • candyman337@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Based on the image, it seems like the argument is that Windows can be installed on a larger variety of devices than the other two

      • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, but Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for that. Windows only works with everything, because everything got built around it.

        Drivers are needed for every little bit of hardware, Intel very well might not have become the dominant architecture if Microsoft hadn’t picked it in the 80s.

  • waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Add another square at the bottom left of the grid that breaks out of the grid on both directions and contains OpenBSD.

  • Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some people don’t like snaps

    “Some people like snaps” would have been closer to the truth, but it would still be an exaggeration of their numbers.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You know what? I know they’re far from the ideal solution, but I have installed a few things with snaps … and it was fine. It worked seamlessly and painlessly (in some instances).

      Generally, I’d prefer other ways to install, but snaps aren’t the end of the world.

      (This concludes my hot take of the day.)

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        snaps aren’t the end of the world

        System engineers all collectively shuddered at that thought. Then OS security nerds.

        This is the “I tried heroin and it was good” story but for OSes

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not a question whether they work or not. It’s whether you’re okay with an app distribution system that forces us to be dependent on one corporation. Snap’s backend effectively makes Ubuntu almost as bad as Android.

        And seeing as there is no shortage of better options, why not choose those?

        • Ack@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          His mom probably likes them too.

          His dad probably says “WTF is this Snap bullshit son? We didn’t raise you like that.”

          Then his mom replies, “it’s just a phase, he needs our support, I’m sure you can make snaps happen, sweetie.”

  • Feyd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Arch Linux breaks if you don’t update it often enough

    pacman -S archlinux-keyring
    

    It’s really that easy