Gdm is slow and buggy comparatively, imo. Gnome has always lagged behind on stability and speed for me, and Cinnamon doesn’t do much to fix those issues for its simplicity.
For its simplicity, were I to choose less features and the minimal design Cinnamon goes for, I’d rather just have XFCE instead. Similar look and function, more mature, if older.
This really comes out if you try KDE on a lower-powered system like an ARM phone. KDE-touch is way more grounded and quick than the gnome solutions.
Garuda is like if someone decided to tick every box they possibly could. I’m not saying they’re good or bad, it’s just, I believe in chaos theory to a degree. Something’s gonna break. It’s a bit much. I’m fine with slapping plasma on Arch and calling it a day.
Gdm is slow and buggy comparatively, imo. Gnome has always lagged behind on stability and speed for me, and Cinnamon doesn’t do much to fix those issues for its simplicity.
For its simplicity, were I to choose less features and the minimal design Cinnamon goes for, I’d rather just have XFCE instead. Similar look and function, more mature, if older.
This really comes out if you try KDE on a lower-powered system like an ARM phone. KDE-touch is way more grounded and quick than the gnome solutions.
I’m lucky I overbuilt my PC then I guess. Interesting though… Looking at different KDE distros I can see the appeal of Garuda Dr460nized.
Garuda is like if someone decided to tick every box they possibly could. I’m not saying they’re good or bad, it’s just, I believe in chaos theory to a degree. Something’s gonna break. It’s a bit much. I’m fine with slapping plasma on Arch and calling it a day.