• shirasho@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    China may be a dictatorship, but they actually put tax money into public projects. When they say they are going to do a project for the next X years it actually gets done. As a result, when cool new projects come up, the infrastructure is already there. It is one of the reasons why Chinese EVs are so good and so cheap.

    Meanwhile, we have the US where the government is wholly noncommittal to public services that don’t extract money from their citizens. They frequently break contracts and agreements when they are no longer profitable or beneficial to the upper class. We have private militaries kidnapping and killing legal citizens just for existing.

    It’s no wonder people view the US less favorably than China. Both are evil, but at least China doesn’t behave like a petulant child.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Chinese EVs are so cheap because of the massive direct subsidies they get from the Chinese government, not because of some infrastructure.

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Just like almost every industy in the US. Agriculture - heavily subsidized. Fossil fuels - heavily subsidized. Medicine - heavily subsidized (even if the patients don’t see any of it). Defense contractors of every shade - heavily subsidized. Only difference is that the US subsidizes to help the billionnaires. China subsidizes to help the general populace.

      • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They are cheap because of the infrastructure AND because of subsidies. But to be honest, European automotive companies also once started out with massive subsidies. Companies like Volkswagen were completely government sponsored in the beginning.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ll take a dictator that seems to care about the well-being of their country over a wannabe dictator that only cares about getting paid any day.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “I’ll take a dictator…”

        This is a MAGA talking point and repeated by MAGA supporters.

        No we won’t.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Americans scream and spit on Chinese democracy while they cling to electoral colleges and governor appointed senators and the fight to disenfranchise minority voters en mass.

        I just don’t know how to take any of it seriously. China’s a dictatorship because it’s ruled by a single, seemingly insurmountable communist party. But Texas and Florida can elect Republicans to a bulletproof supermajority for 40 years and that’s just the Will Of The People.

        A Congress with a 20% approval rating enjoys a Lockean Mandate, while a Parliament with 50-70% approval is a tyrannical regime of brutal oppression.

        And don’t even get me started on prison population…

        How are we even defining democracy anymore? It just seems like American Exceptionalism.

        • huppakee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          How are we even defining democracy anymore?

          There are multiple organisations invested in rating democracies worldwide, the main one is from The Economist EIU ,(https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2025/, there are numerous places where the raw data is published more accessible such as here: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu).

          I personally prefer the index made by Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world) because it includes what a regular citizen experiences:

          For each country and territory, Freedom in the World analyzes the electoral process, political pluralism and participation, the functioning of the government, freedom of expression and of belief, associational and organizational rights, the rule of law, and personal autonomy and individual rights.

          Their assessment of the US democracy:

          EIU (2024): 7.85/10, “flawed democracy” Freedom in the world score (2025): 81/100

          These scores obviously are not about other things that matter, like economic stability or access to healthcare.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Damn, you can’t even use China as the positive comparison here without some random tankie getting pissed I didn’t adequately glaze China.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            you can’t even use China as the positive comparison here

            tankie

            Yeah, the comparison is positive, but also anyone who disagrees with you wants you murdered by a tank.

            FFS, can you people take any level of criticism?

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              murdered by a tank.

              Oh! All this time and I hadn’t clocked that tankie was referencing the Tiananmen Square massacre. That makes a lot of sense.

              I thought it was something related to think-tanks or something, some kind of weird way of saying “brainiac” or having “big-brained ideas” in a derogatory manner.