• narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is inaccurate. You are not buying it (the media), you are buying the right to stream it (as long as the seller provides the media as a stream). You don’t “buy” a movie unless you are paying for it’s ownership, which would be millions of dollars. For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM). And you generally don’t have a right be able to “buy” or have access to all media.

    But all that doesn’t automaticly make it amoral. this comment is gonna be downvoted to hell

    edit: There are probably gonna be more responces, so this will address everything else I have to say. What I wrote is how things are legally, more or less. I don’t like that either. I do consider piracy stealing (under current laws) and morally right. Stealing is just not that great term for digital stuff. Please don’t try to (uselessly) sway me and don’t infight

    • Quetzacoatl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      this meme is a criticism of that. it shouldn’t be like that. if I buy a chair, I own the chair. I can then choose to sit on it, burn it, or give it to my neighbor, whatever. if I buy a movie, it’s suddenly not like that – but not because of some inherent quality that would make it impossible, but only because they say it is like that. but they have one weakness: it’s only like that if we actually stick to those rules. they’re all arbitrary anyway! we can therefore treat a bought movie just as it should be: a physical copy that we actually own. we can then decide to watch it, to lend it to our neighbor, to play it for everybody to see on the street, to cut it and remix it and do something new with it. will they come and claim we’ve “pirated” their media? yes of course, but this is nonsensical, dead law, that has to be broken again and again by just – ignoring it, and making it not so. if I buy a movie, I do own the movie, and the company that says otherwise can get fucked. that’s what this is about.

    • Melkor@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s kind of their point, because we are not in fact buying the media the argument is that piracy has some moral element. Put another way there is no option to own it outside of piracy.

      • narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah kinda, but there deosn’t need to be an option to own media. You are not entitled to that. It’s up to the creator/owner how to use/sell their things. It’s whole another question if it should be that way

        • Melkor@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The entitlement comes from it existing, once you put something out there it belongs to the public forever. Laws around this are designed to create incentive but it does far more to lock out folks who could benefit/enjoy it but otherwise would never experience it. I don’t think you have a right to have the Mona Lisa in your house but you have a right to see reproductions forever and I want that for digital art too.

      • TAYRN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no legal option to own you. Is it moral, then, for me to turn to illegal means to own you?

        Now replace “you” with “content you created”, and tell me how it’s different.

        • FranticParrot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And replace “you” with an exploitive company that doesn’t give two shits about anything but making a number go up.

        • Melkor@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A person vs art, that’s the line where our opinion would differ I guess. Art/media is part of the world/history and it feels wrong to lock out large parts of it essentially forever. Let us pay for things and have them, it’s that simple. Once it cannot be sold it should be publically available if someone who has it wants to make it so. But again this all crosses into opinion, you can’t own a person and be a good citizen at the same time but many pirates are productive members of society or couldn’t buy to begin with.

          • TAYRN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Art/media is part of the world/history

            And they are created by human beings, who have every right to decide what their creations are worth to them and under what terms other people can use their creations. I whittled a pretty cool dragon out of a stick once. It’s technically part of the world/history. That doesn’t mean anyone else has a right to it.

            Let us pay for things and have them, it’s that simple.

            Absolutely, if I am willing to sell you that thing for the price you are offering. If I am not, then the deal doesn’t go through. That is how deals work. You cannot rent a car for $60/day and then decide “actually I’m going to keep this forever.” That was not the deal you agreed upon.

            Once it cannot be sold it should be publically available if someone who has it wants to make it so

            Yes, I agree. In this case, though, the person who “has it” is the owner. Not the person who signed a deal saying “I myself will use this under the terms we have both agreed upon” and then proceeds to break those terms. Copyright law (in the US) is bullshit and needs a whole lot of reform, but if we’re talking about media made recently? By a still living human? Yes, they should own what they create.

            but many pirates are productive members of society or couldn’t buy to begin with

            Yes, I imagine this applies to both you and I as pirates. But as a productive member of society, I am fully aware that I am not entitled to anything owned by anyone else. I will not die if I don’t see that new movie I want to, and I am aware of that. I know that me pirating is both immoral and illegal, and directly hurts others. I am willing to admit that.

            • Melkor@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thanks for the well thought out response, I believe your dragon may belong to someone else and it may rightfully be theirs, someday. I get what you’re saying in terms of practical day to day, but there is a harmful nature to copyright which is not discussed and I think that’s more important to come to terms with morally vs any harm caused by piracy. I also believe the harm piracy does cause can be mitigated with a more aware system. Once something is created you are in a power struggle to own it that you will lose with absolute certainly if the thing is not destroyed after your time with it.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM).

      I’d like to point out German law (maybe this expands to EU and other countries) with traditional media.

      Traditionally you bought movies and music on physical discs. You had a guaranteed right to be able to sell it to other people, as well as make personal copies of it for private use/backups.

      DRM has always tried to oppose this right. And obviously, in the last decade(s) a lot went into service-oriented streaming and temporary access instead of owning even on a partial or theoretical level.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Legally, piracy is not stealing. It is copyright infringement. That’s a totally different ball game with different implications.

      While stealing even cheap items quickly lands you in legal hot water, just downloading (without uploading) doesn’t. I don’t know of a single case where someone got a significant fine or even a lawsuit for just downloading (and not redistributing) content.

      The legal main difference between stealing and illegaly copying is that when you steal something it’s gone.

      This changes the damages calculation a lot, since the only damage you caused by copying is the opportunity cost: Since you copied it, they didn’t sell it to you. But you might have already bought it in the meantime (then the damages 0), or you might have not bought it at all (then the damages are also 0).

      Also, stealing is criminal law, while copyright is civil law, which makes it legally entirely different.

      Looks nitpicky, but if you talk about current laws, nitpicky is the whole game.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I’ve bought the right to play the game, what’s “the game” that I’m entitled to if they decide to take away what makes it the thing I agreed to have access to?

    • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piracy is always stealing. Y’all can keep trying to spin it if it helps, but its pure copium.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well first of all, yes it is stealing to take something that does not belong to you. The definition of stealing is not beholden to the consequences of the actions itself.

          Furthermore, if you pirate to avoid paying a subscription, then yes they are losing something. I’m a massive pirate. I steal all my media. I feel no guilt and I also have no delusions about what I am doing. I do it to save money.

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            undefined> es it is stealing to take something that does not belong to you

            you are not taking anything . literally nothing.

            im just looking at the thing and making a very good copy with my hard drive. literally taking a picture of something.

            0 objects will be transferred to me in this example. nothing,nada,nulla.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes you are taking something. Of course you are. You are a taking a video file which you do not have the right to. Why do you need to convince yourself there is nothing grimy about doing? Like jesus christ, just be grimey. Wht you gotta lie to yourself?

              • stappern@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                undefined> You are a taking a video file which you do not have the right to

                no im not. my man you can repeat this all day but it doesnt make it true. you dont TAKE anything through the internet. this is FACT. you cant make up physics…

                you can look at something and make an exact copy of it. no objects get transferred. its not a thing.

                  • stappern@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    its not semantic. you are claiming a transfer of goods is happening, that is NOT TRUE.

                    now that this is clear we can argue about the rest but again if you want to imply some crime based on goods based transfer you are just wrong and id say in bad faith.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but there’s a huge difference between stealing a physical object and copying data without permission.

      • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For most of us sods it’s a choice between pirating content or not engaging in it at all. While the upper management of Sony or Disney might live in their profit-focused bubble, everyone else involved with a product would rather we actually participate in their patch of human culture.

        But I’m happy to not watch your show or listen to your music, if my presence offends you.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Entirely besides the point. As for the last point, that’s pretty funny😂 if you’re pirating it it literally makes no difference.

          • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The difference is, your culture is not getting out there.

            The reason we all know Joffrey is a git of a king and the Red Wedding was a day to call in sick is because the GoT series was massively pirated and HBO ignored it. It also why we had a decade of gratuitous boobs on television. It also accounted for HBO being stupendously rich for a while.

            It’s kinda like depending on the wind for sailing, your crew on deck are going to be hot because there isn’t much breeze. The more you tap consumption of your art for money, the narrower the gateway and the less it becomes culture, until you end up like Prince (the musician) with most of your work locked away in a vault, unknown to anyone.

            But you seem like a the law’s the law sort of fellow, and would be simping for the state even as it was torturing your fellow statesmen.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              GOT wasn’t funded through culture. Also they most certainly didn’t ignore it, they just failed to stop it.

              Do my a favor and stick your assumptions up your mother’s asshole. I’m a pirate, I just don’t have any delusions about what it is. I’m not so egotistical that I need to convince myself that it’s not stealing just because I’m doing it.

              • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I find your pirate cred dubious. You came onto a pirate thread to throw shade, which smacks to me of Christian vigilantes wandering into a gay bar to start trouble. Or a guy online compelled to send his dick-pic to women online for internal insecurities he can’t consciously fathom.

                You’re not here to protest the problems with stealing, not in the current economic clime. You’re here because you need to shit on others, and are trying to justify it by opposing piracy when even the IP holders know it’s losing game that only hurts themselves. It’s the legal firms they’ve tapped who are over eager to show they’re earning their pay.

                You want to evade my assumptions, go crawl back into your hole, or do some proper fucking research. (Start here, and enjoy.).

                But so long as you’re raising a stink and I’m nearby, you’re going to have to choke on the toxic vitriol of my ideology. I won’t suffer your moralizing in silence.

                • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The mere notion that piracy might be stealing sends you into a paragraphs long tirade. Pretty stupid. I simply don’t care that it’s stealing.

                  • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Piracy is always stealing. Y’all can keep trying to spin it if it helps, but its pure copium.

                    So you’re just being equivocal and trolling?

      • stappern@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        sharing is never stealing since you are not removing anything from somebody :) yall can keep spinning it but a a bag full of all the stuff i shared would be a bag weighing 0 grams.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet you still shared something. Those files exist. This is an extremely weak argument honestly.

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            no i havent, i mean you can technically call it sharing but i just let somebody take a look at my 0 and 1 and they arrange them in the same way. again nothing is being transferred other than knowledge of where those 0 and 1 go.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Something is being tranferred, and that is the picture which you do not own nor have any right to own.

              • stappern@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                no its not. if i tell you “hey the 0 gos to the right” i havent transferred shit to you. information is not goods.

                • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That is a dishonest characterization. The video file obviously has value, or you wouldn’t be interested in it. We aren’t talking about a singular bool, but the configuration of the bools of that specific file, which whatever company owns and which they sell the right to view.

                  • stappern@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    but its not stealing, if you could make an exact copy of a chair by just snapping your fingers that also wouldnt be a crime. why would it??

                    now if you want to sell that design and pocket the money i can see some issues but thats not what we do, we make a copy and we play it/watch it. literally not stealing, no property has moved owner.