That is a dishonest characterization. The video file obviously has value, or you wouldn’t be interested in it. We aren’t talking about a singular bool, but the configuration of the bools of that specific file, which whatever company owns and which they sell the right to view.
but its not stealing, if you could make an exact copy of a chair by just snapping your fingers that also wouldnt be a crime. why would it??
now if you want to sell that design and pocket the money i can see some issues but thats not what we do, we make a copy and we play it/watch it. literally not stealing, no property has moved owner.
Something is being tranferred, and that is the picture which you do not own nor have any right to own.
no its not. if i tell you “hey the 0 gos to the right” i havent transferred shit to you. information is not goods.
That is a dishonest characterization. The video file obviously has value, or you wouldn’t be interested in it. We aren’t talking about a singular bool, but the configuration of the bools of that specific file, which whatever company owns and which they sell the right to view.
but its not stealing, if you could make an exact copy of a chair by just snapping your fingers that also wouldnt be a crime. why would it??
now if you want to sell that design and pocket the money i can see some issues but thats not what we do, we make a copy and we play it/watch it. literally not stealing, no property has moved owner.
LMFAO! It’s called a patent genius!
and?
It has a name too, it’s called COUNTERFEITING
no its not XD you are not selling it or getting access to secret stuff
The manufacture part of the law is what you’re missing😂 and you say I’m out of arguments.