• Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just googled to see if I was misremembering because I definitely browsed the regular web on my Nokia N73. It also came out in 2006, and back in the day it was not called a smartphone.

          I would say your statement is factually incorrect.

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ll say I’m correct on a technicality. 2006 is not “long before smartphones” only a year or so. The N73 is a sort of proto-smartphone, even if the term wasn’t in use yet.

            • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m really curious what other metric there is for a smart phone than “accessing the web” and/or “downloading apps”. Thats the barebones definition of smart TVs or any other appliance or equipment, why are phones somehow different?

              Why are people trying to define it so specifically? So they can feel better about themselves?

              • Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                The point where it becomes a general-purpose computing device, I think. Programmability is generally what makes it “smart”, i.e. not having the limitation of predefined “features” which make it a feature phone.

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Isn’t a feature phone a “dumb phone”? A phone meant for calling and texting, with preinstalled programs, and that’s it. So yeah, installable apps and a browser would instantly make it a smart phone.