• Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    oh no a 24 hour ban!

    idk how this is hypocrisy, you got plenty of responses for some of the lowest effort trolling i’ve seen

    • garth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      PPB is “Pig Pooping on Balls.” One of hexbear’s favorite reaction photos is a pig with testicles so large they stick out back, and the pig literally has some of its own poop resting on its gargantuan balls.

      So I guess they have a list of users they see as helpless, ignorant pigs. Delightful bunch, those hexbears.

        • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They fully realize how unhinged they are. Back when it was r/chapotraphouse they would convince chuds trying to debate them to show their dicks. They don’t respect online discourse generally and especially with those they see as bad faith.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            On the off chance you’re not simply pulling that out of your ass, point out a single unlabeled bot, the admins of most instances will ban them and look very hard at continued federation with an instance that permits that.

            But come on, we both know you made that up.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Heh, someone downvoted you as if they think you made that up. Can’t blame them for that assumption.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a joke that went over OP’s head.

      He came to Hexbear to sling shit and get banned so that he’d have something to whine about.

      One user, recognizing the irony, made a joke about Hexbear having it’s own list. A mod thought the joke was funny and decided to commit to the bit by putting it in the modlog, while also limiting it to a 24 hour ban.

      That way, he got the ban he went looking for and he gets to make this post, but he also looks completely ridiculous whining about it to anyone paying attention.

  • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lemmy is a lot weirder of a place when you start to realize instances are like virtual nation-states and the admin teams are ALL despotic auth-rulers with the temperaments of toddlers.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like this is an overly extreme take. Coming off of being on reddit for years I am astounded on a day to day with just how much I can actually get away with saying on Lemmy and expressing myself here. I find myself continuously reflecting on the fact that even in my most liberal (in the literary sense) takes with others, I’m still holding back, sugarcoating, or discounting things as “worth saying” at least 30% of the time. I don’t know what’s going on over on piefed, but Lemmy as a whole has been the opposite of authoritarian censorship for me. I’ve never felt more outspoken in an online presence.

    • Mora@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      are like virtual nation-states and the admin teams are ALL despotic auth-rulers with the temperaments of toddlers

      So just like the big ones minus the capitalistic machine…

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      People fail to understand that exactly this is the concept of a federation. You only agree on a few things, in this case the software, everything else, however, is fully individual.

      Federation is not the solution here. The only solution that would work is peer to peer - no hosts at all, pure anarchy.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      For real. I can’t even keep up with what db0’s weird ass mod stances are. I just wanna look at memes and chat with people

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        db0 seems fixated on complex governance arrangements. We get it. You’re an anarchist. Amazing.

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not even an anarchist, I just wanted a somewhat populated instance with less down time than world. The political ideation of the more hardcore members of db0 certainly seems like a pipedream more than a realistic plan for government (or lack thereof). But hey, I’ll take hate for consolidated political power over bootlicking any day.

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I agree, but thats not really what im getting at.

            Theres this Fediverse Anarchist Flotilla which is supposed to be like an alliance of instances with shared rules and commitments and whatever. It just seems completely unnecessary to me.

            Its like… 5 people catch up every week to drink beer and watch a movie. Its great and everyone enjoys it. Then one guy says you need a chairperson, and rules, and a secret handshake, and a versioning system for the rules, and a documented arrangement with some other guys who do the same thing at someone else’s house, and your own crypto coin for donations, and all the things.

            Its all unnecessary.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Its an elective (voluntary) federation.

              Within a framework designed for and around federating.

              So analagously, consider maybe a set of countries that agree to a mutual trade agreement.

              Instead of a multiplicity of bilateral negotiations, you have a collective group mechanism for dispute settlement, or maybe steering and implementing a new or revised regional strategy.

              Or, to drop the analogy down to the more mundane and practical:

              Instead of you and 5 of your friends all texting each other seperately, to figure out the carpool schedule for next week… you all just have a group chat for this.

              This can seem unnecessary when scales are small.

              Then maybe you happen to scale up, and then you find that the old way of doing things is actually very chaotic and confusing, and has a whole bunch of serious flaws.

              Then you look back at the goobers that did all that seemingly at the time pointless extra work, and call that foresight.

              • fizzle@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I guess the metaphors break down in considering the mass of “governance structure” in the context of the stuff that requires governance.

                IMO, the FAF is a top heavy absurdity. A layer of governance that serves no purpose.

                Whether or not it’s foresight remains to be seen.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            anarcho-pragmatism, lol

            this shit seems to suck at least a little bit less than most other shit, therfore, join the anarchist instance

            unironically i love this

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      the astronaut meme but its ‘wait that is how almost everything ever has worked this whole time?’

      lemmy just fundamentally attempts to accept that that is basically how people work, when you boil things down and remove the rationalizations, and tries to provide mechanisms to manage this somewhat less insanely.

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Our admins are lovely but severely overworked. Most admin teams I’ve interacted with are kind but overladen. Some are definitely emotionally stunted but I definitely wouldn’t establish that as a rule

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        gross, a piefed link.

        it’s funny. back when the mass exodus happened from lemmy to piefed I called out how cultish the community sounded and how the users seemed to be kind of toxic. they protected piefed like it was “special”.

        of course I was downvoted, expectantly.

        doesn’t seem I was too far off the mark tbh…

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      He’s the piefed dev.

      Piefed is a 1 to 1 replacement for lemmy, compatible with other fediverse things.

      I joined a piefed instance specifically to move away from the lemmy devs.

      Now it turns out the piefed dev is a petulant fief lord.

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I figured it was the Piefed or similar creator given the context. Just wasn’t sure. Part of the reason I switched from lemmy world to Piefed social

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I love the way sometimes it’s “fuck him and everything he stands for!” and other times “damn straight, I stand with him for the things he stands for!”

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sometimes the Tankies claim they stand with X because X opposes Y, but then if anybody mentions all the times X stood with Y and all the times X said things they clearly don’t stand for, then they have no response but “you’ve been brainwashed by the media”.

        • MushuChupacabra@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I switched specifically because tankies are pissy about piefed.

          I literally wouldn’t have had any interest if not for the one two punch of the above, plus the cunty moderation antics of Dessalines et. al. on .ml.

          • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Piefed literally has social credit score lol. The dude in charge is a nanny who thinks the users aren’t wise enough to do their own blocking. There’s been a shit ton of drama surrounding that dork in recent weeks, and all he’s done is dig in.

            • MushuChupacabra@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I would engage with you on your instance, but i appear to have been banned on .ml

              I highly suspect that you will have a long leash here, and will be allowed to say just about whatever you want.

              Consider that the source of your consternation is that you do not appreciate piefed’s Tit, for .ml’s Tat.

              • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                but i appear to have been banned on .ml

                Uhhh, yeah you were making threats on people’s lives lol

                I highly suspect that you will have a long leash here, and will be allowed to say just about whatever you want.

                Bruh, you yourself just had your leash yanked on .world

                What are you even talking about? Rimu is an authoritarian is the point.

                • MushuChupacabra@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I stand by every syllable.

                  But just for funzies, I will take you to task, and get you to explain with precision how “I” would be the source of the death threat, if the Russian Military sent an underperforming troll to the front line?

                  Are you suggesting that I have the power to get the Russian Military to press a troll into service?

                  If a Russian troll gets sent to fight in Ukraine, they would get a personalized drone visit.

                  Those are just facts.

                  Bruh, you yourself just had your leash yanked on .world

                  Yes. And?

                  Here are other “Threats” and “racist” and “hateful” facts that get deleted on .ml:

                  Stalin was actually a very bad man who executed a lot of Russians.

                  The net immigration/defection trend during the Cold War, was people fleeing from the Warsaw Pact, and not to the Warsaw Pact.

                  Your comments here will likely stay up here, while .ml moderation demands that Stalin be venerated, and that Putin’s Cold War revivalist bullshit is just peachy keen.

                  The designation of .ml feels inaccurate. It should be .mS for marxist Stalinist. Capital S for Stalin, and just a little m for Karl, based on the reality of how .ml actually is.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                cold warrior got a temp ban on two comms, not the instance (and it’s already expired) for calling people you don’t like russian.

                k.

                • MushuChupacabra@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  This feels like a word salad.

                  I think you were trying for some sort of gotcha or zinger.

                  I’m feeling generous, so good ahead and pretend im flustered for a bit.

                  Bask in your cleverness.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well, the Lemmy devs have stated that their goal isn’t to design a system that scales well and it shows. Part of it is that there may be a future where there are too many new users for a mod team to handle, especially if the barrier for signing up is extremely low.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’d think a bunch of self proclaimed communists would support someone cloning software for free. Hexbear is such a joke.

          • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hexbear was a fork of Lemmy that was merged back into the main build, which sh.it.just.works runs on. You are using their cloned software for free right now. That’s obviously not their issue.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s obviously not their issue.

              Perhaps if we were talking about sane individuals with consistent beliefs, but these people are hypocrisy incarnate. Years of being isolated in a cult environment has rotted their brains into what you see here.

              • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                No, I’m pointing out you’re objectively incorrect, you can’t just go “but they’re soooo crraaaaaazy!” and pretend it validates your opinion you stupid little child.

                • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You didn’t state any objective facts other than stating it was a fork of lemmy. For someone who considers themselves to have such an elevated intellect, I’m surprised you didn’t realize that.

      • AzuranAurora@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not like Rimu is helping his situation by making a complete ass of himself as of late.

      • Vespair@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s probably true, but it’s worth noting that not all of the Rimu controversy is coming from tankies. I’m arguably pretty “moderate” for the fediverse and I and many others like me also find their conduct and software worthy of concern.

        The way I see it, our options are this:

        Lemmy, a neutral software developed and ran by people with some questionable politics that they keep separate from but hosted on Lemmy.

        Or Piefed, a software with ideology built directly into it developed by people with probably much more palatable politics (for me at least) but who believes said politics should be systemic in the fediverse.

        Tbh, I don’t 100% love either of these options, but I have no interest in trading overbearing corporate nannys for a homegrown farm-to-table nanny. I’m an adult, I don’t need or want somebody else dictating sensibilities for me.

        So Lemmy it is.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      yeah same. got banned for a few and decided it was actually quite nice then set up an instance block for .ml.

      real leftists aren’t bootlickers for anyone.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        unless it was on a different account i don’t think you got banned at all. i see one comment that got removed for ‘be respectful’ cause you were saying that peoples view on china was without nuance and a sub-middle school orientation. essentially showing up to argue against a caricature.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The funny part is that as a db0 user, I haven’t even really seen the drama. I’ve seen people talking about the drama, but the only thing I’ve directly seen has been when the db0 admins got banned. Which seemed pretty funny on a petty level, but also raises a lot of questions about whether or not they’d still be able to effectively moderate if they’re banned from instances that their users are still interacting on.

      Like if piefed were to ban a db0 admin, could that db0 admin still see (and take action) when a piefed user is causing trouble on db0? Does the ban hide piefed users, and potentially allow them to break db0 rules with impunity? Or inversely, piefed would have no right to complain about db0 users causing trouble on piefed communities if the db0 admins can’t see it to take action. If I were to go post something bad on piefed, could the db0 admins see it to take action against me? I’m honestly not sure how the mod tools would work in that instance, especially if the ban prevents the banned admin from seeing the offending posts in either direction.

      I’m not saying instance admins should have carte blanche to do whatever they want without risk of getting banned. But banning an admin should probably be considered more heavily than simply banning a regular user, especially if you’re still planning on remaining federated with that instance.

      I can see an argument being made that an admin ban should automatically defederate the admin’s instance, unless the mod tools still allow the banned admin to police their own users. But even then, allowing the banned admin to circumvent the ban using mod tools runs the risk of completely defeating the purpose of the ban. Because it would essentially allow the banned admin to evade (or at least partially evade) the ban by falling back to the mod tools instead. For instance, what if an admin was banned for stalking or harassing a user, but the admin tools still allow the banned admin to stalk and harass that user? In that case, the banning instance has made a good faith attempt to protect their user from the banned admin, and the built-in tools are preventing that action from being effective. Or inversely, what if one instance admin bans another, to attempt to hide their activities on the banned admin’s home instance? If the db0 admin is banned from piefed, can they still see piefed users who interact with db0 communities? If not, that could easily be abused to enable brigading/raiding/takeovers/etc.

      It’s a tricky game of push and pull. One side of me wants to say that banning an instance admin shouldn’t prevent them from seeing your instance at all, because you’re still federated. Stop them from posting or commenting as a regular user, but still allow them to do admin things like police their users’ comments. After all, if you’re still federated, they should be fully able to police their own users. If db0’s admin can’t see activity on piefed, piefed loses the right to complain when db0 users cause trouble on piefed.

      But that runs the risk of making bans seem pointless, and would push admins towards defederation instead. Especially since basically anyone can spin up an instance and become their own admin. And (at least in my mind) defederation should be a last resort, not a first choice. Because defederation has the potential to affect vast swaths of the fediverse, not just the admin directly.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Banned admins can still see instance users from the instance that banned them, but in lemmy at least our moderation actions get silently dropped. I don’t know if that’s true of piefed, but if it is, it means that any malicious users from other instances we handle won’t be moderated when viewed by piefed. E.g a spammer’s posts would still remain visible on their side

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Can join ours. Not small, but completely neutral - no drama, no defederation, no prejudice towards the users.

        Personal choice is paramount here. Crafted with love, peacefully housing people all across the political spectra.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          i would join but i’m a fucking drama magnet. like, i can read a book in the back seat of my car and if anyone is going to get hit and runned in the parking lot, it’s me.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      same here, i tried to understand the dbzero/pefed drama, its all tankies trying argue with the ADMINS how thier misinformation harrasments, and peddling isnt what they claim, but they would not be so kind in return. that staments users was up to something a few months ago with the piefed admins, i assume he leans into tankie territoriy. its the same as arguing with conservatives since they are a mirror image, had enough of propaganda on reddit to ignore this.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that you think the replies weren’t self aware is the funniest part of all this.

        Like, you actually think they just randomly decided to describe banning you (for 24 hours btw) as “putting you on a list” under a post about a banlist, and it wasn’t an intentional reference?

        If you actually stopped and thought about it for like two seconds, you’d get the joke, but you’re so caught up in your original thought of, “I’ll get myself banned to show how hypocritical they are” that you missed it completely.

      • TotallyWorthLife (She/Her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Ah, so basically the same problem there is on Reddit with power-tripping mods that manage several subreddits.

        At least it’s federated so being banned in one instance and its communities doesn’t keep you from joining or making similar communities in your own instance, or joining a different instance

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lemmy is a reddit-style forum framework on the fediverse. People clone a copy and launch their own instances which can communicate with each other, so that no one person can rule over it.

      So theres these guys who want China to win a nuclear war and the enslavement of trans people into labor camps, Lemmy ML and Hexbear. They are the Lemmy Developers and all money for lemmy development goes to them.

      Then theres this Rimu dude who started development of PieFed which is just another framework to do the same exact thing that Lemmy does and they communicate with each other flawlessly, which makes the Tankies super duper angry because they wanted you to fund their autocratic ideology and help them spread propaganda.

      The reason so many people are so involved in this is that you’re either on a Lemmy based instance or a PieFed based instance, so this does directly impact everyone here reading this.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        incorrect: my instance is just the admin manually reading and outputting bits furiously, like the telegraph operator in Lucky Luke

      • TotallyWorthLife (She/Her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ohhh shit, thanks for updating me on the whole situation. Guess I’ll have to take a look at Lemmy and PieFed, and their devs, and see where I want to stand lol

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    and these are the same people mad over rimu blocking and banning tankies from piefed. i look at all those posts why he was banning people.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So wait, a guy who sucks made a thing I don’t use and if I complain about him he’ll ban me from using it?

    That’s a long road to a big pile of “who gives a fuck?”

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You can’t debate a takie. Debating them is like hitting a head against the wall. The best you can do is to purge them out

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      i loved how all i have to do is read the modlog for people talking about wanting to ‘purge’ ‘takies’[sic] and it’s shit like this:

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah. They disagreed with me, so labeled me as Nazi transphobe and removed posts/banned me immediately. This is tankie mentality. There’s no point in arguing with them

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          these aren’t even ‘tankie’ instances and i can see your transphobic comment right there in the modlog.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              actually i meant this one:

              also here’s you shittalking after renee good got executed; fuck ice and you’re clearly on their side

              @Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com this is the kinda person you have agreeing with you about how bad ‘takies’ are doggirl-lol

              • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I literally do not give a shit about your opinion, nor the other dude’s opinion that you drudged up. @ing me in this is pathetic.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  not as pathetic as making multiple posts crying about getting a 24 hour ban (it expires in an hour) for posting low-effort bait.

                  i’m just highlighting that some of the people eagerly supporting you ‘owning the tankies’ are pro-ice transphobes, talking about wanting to purge them.

                  if you actually care about authoritarianism i’d expect you to be a little more concerned about those sort of people surrounding you.

              • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                actually i meant this one:

                So am I allowed to say that there are only two genders or not? The whole thing is obviously relating to JKR and backlash after what she said. Are you people that dense?

                also here’s you shittalking after renee good got executed; fuck ice and you’re clearly on their side

                Did she not barricade the way with her car? Did she not try to escape almost running over the ICE guy?

                And assuming ICE is full Nazi: Tell me is it smart thing to come swinging against fully armed SS? Yes or NO. Very simple question.

                • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You are allowed to say whatever stupid transphobic shit you want, and to complain loudly and stupidly about the extremely predictable consequences like you’re doing

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes or NO. Very simple question.

                  i’m not here to debate you about how much people should respect the gestapo, officer