I asked this to an AI, and it didn’t say anything intelligible, maybe I’m just not smart enough to understand AI.
You must log in or # to comment.
- it’s free
- runs on a wider range of hardware
- is more customizable
- can run much windows software with wine or proton
- has a large ecosystem of native software
- much of it free and open source
The advantage of Mac is it’s more widely used and thus more widely supported (for things that are supported at all). You can just buy an apple computer from a trusted source and it’ll work. Linux doesn’t quite have that yet. If more people move to Linux , you’ll find better drivers and stuff.
Personally I find the MacOS interface to be horrendous. Window management is bad. The Mac apps are always opening my files instead of the third-party ones I designated as default. It’s messy.
Other than that my primary concern with MacOS is that you can only run it on insanely expensive, irreparable, unupgradeable, disposable hardware.
It’s not
You should ask the AI what the advantages are of Linux Mint over macOS. You should then ask the reverse and compare the pros and cons from both angles.
Note that the AI is just going to aggregate Reddit posts and dress up the language a bit. But you should get good information.
As a macOS user typing on a Mac mini (M2 Pro) running macOS 26.2 Tahoe, I will say that Linux is better for gaming via Proton. We have the Game Porting Tool Kit (GPTK) but this is not really user facing. We have paid options like CrossOver, and there used to be a free option called Whisky, but it’s been discontinued. Linux is kind of awesome for gaming and like, most games run on Linux now. (I choose to game on Xbox and Switch, but that’s beside the point.)
I think macOS is a slightly more polished product, but the trade-off for Linux is, you can run it on more hardware (like if you have an ageing PC and you don’t want to get a Mac — or, if you can find a decent PC for the price of an M4 Mac mini, which goes for $500), and you have more control over the software. For example, it just came up again in the Windows communities that Windows 11 can’t move its taskbar to the sides or the top like it’s done since Windows 95 through Windows 10. macOS has a menu bar that is stuck on the top always (always has been) but it has an application dock on the bottom that can move to the left (but not the right, nor can it sit on or under the menu bar at the top). In Linux, not only can you put your system bar wherever you want it, I think you can customise it to have more than one (like you can go macOS and have a menu/system bar and dock, but you can put them where you want them).
I personally wouldn’t choose Linux over macOS, but if I did, I would start with Ubuntu. Personal preference. And, while I wouldn’t trade my MacBook, I could use Linux on the desktop. I wouldn’t hate it. I like my Mac, but if I got ahold of an older PC, like something a company was getting rid of because it can’t run Windows 11 (say, a 7th generation i5 with 16GB of RAM would be nice), I’d wipe the drive and put Linux on it. I would not try to make it a Hackintosh (I’m honestly not gonna do the work). Coming from an office, it would likely be sold without a drive. So I’d get a cheap SATA SSD (like 500/512GB) and put Ubuntu on it.
It runs on generic hardware so you don’t have to pay the Apple tax.
Fair point, but also, the M4 Mac mini is $500 for a pretty competitive chip, 16GB RAM, and 256GB on-chip SSD. You can beat that with a PC (and probably get a bit bigger drive, like 500GB, and you’d be able to upgrade), but you wouldn’t save that much money. The Windows license puts it over; of course, the idea is you get someone to sell you one without a Windows license and install Linux. But if they aren’t including Windows, they aren’t selling in enough bulk to get the price down. There are a bunch of little computers from China that are competitive, but do you trust them? Up to you, I guess.
The other option, I went over in my top-level comment, is to find a gently used office PC that can’t be upgraded to Windows 11, like a 7th gen i5. It’s not gonna be competitive, performance wise, against that M4 Mac mini, though, but you might get it for like $100 from eBay or something, so maybe it’s fine.
To add to your point, not only does it run on “generic” hardware, it runs on “whatever” hardware.
The way AI works, it’s likely to pick up on your style. I.e. if you ask with slang words or spelling mistakes, it’s going to answer very colloquially. And this translates to meaning… Once you ask “stupid” questions, it’s going to mistake that for a creative writing assignment. And I think your question is a bit alike »What’s better, oranges or papayas?« That’s just a weird question and you’ll get a weird answer. Linux and MacOS are very different things. Used by different people for different tasks. None of them is “better” without any context given.
Who typically uses Mint, in your opinion?
My wife and some relatives? Along with countless other people… We have a zero electronics devices with fruit on them -policy, in this household. But we do provide Lightning cables for guests… I mean MacOS doesn’t even run on a Thinkpad without several stunts and a day of work involved… You need to patch the UEFI, do something to the graphics, patch the ISO, or happen to have the exact right model. And it violates the terms and conditions. So MacOS isn’t really an alternative, is it?
Well, each one has pros and cons. *UNIX (I’m including *Linux and *BSD only, since masOS is technically based on a Unix-like kernel) systems tend to provide more control to the user, as they are Libre Software
What is Libre Software?
Libre Software is one in which you have the following freedoms: 1: Run the program for any purpose 2: Study the program by any means 3: Modify the program code in any manner 4: Distribute the program at any price
Depending on the Libre Software license, there can be conditions: 1: In any copies which you distribute, you must provide credit to authors of which code you used 2: If any patented techniques are on the code, you must provide rights to them 3: Any code that is put on the program is also licensed under it, and you must pass down the same freedoms and obligations
Better for what? The question in isolation is fairly meaningless.
Macos doesn’t solve the ownership or customisation of OS problem that windows also has.
Mint does. Don’t like how macos does something? Too bad.
Don’t like how mint does something? Someone likely already has a package to fix it.You’re surprised you got bullshit from the bullshit machine?
No way… some really smart tech guys told me it will be worth a lot of money some day.
No, some dipshit tech bros were bullshitting you.
Holy shit, that’s impossible, they make a lot more money than I do, so they must be right somehow.
