• AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In Spanish, we have a saying: “En casa de herrero, cuchara de palo”.
    A rough translation would be “in the blacksmith’s house you’ll find wood spoons”. It’s not a new thing, it’s been like that since ancient times.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah but I doubt that saying has ever been used to mean the blacksmith thinks metal spoons are bad. Right?

      It’s worth sharing but this post is more about the software engineer knows how much shit is spying on you.

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “The cobbler’s kids have no shoes” in English.

      But this guy is saying he doesn’t trust technology not to spy or be vulnerable.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That ks for sharing this, this is fascinating.

      Maybe the underlying rule is: the more you know about something, the more you are aware of its flaws, making the alternatives you know less about more attractive?

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Is that the same thing? The impression I get is that OPs post is about the IT worker actively distrusting smart tech. While I assume your example is more that the blacksmith doesn’t bother with making metal spoons for himself and using what ever he had already, which would be more comparable to a network engineer still using the ISPs shitty router.

      • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Wooden spoons are better for cooking with cast iron pots and pans, which a blacksmith, being knowledgeable about metal, would be vey aware of.

        Just as the it person is way more aware of the pitfalls of smart tech than your average person

              • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 hours ago

                P sure (but not entirely) that thats for when you purposely want to remove the lining, fx for resale, to make it look brand new

                Havent personally heard chainmail reccomended tho, mostly heard of steel sponges, chainmail sounds way cooler tho lol

                • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Depends how hard you scrape. Steel sponges with a lot of force will take you down to metal, chainmail might work nicely for cleaning stuck on food without damaging the coating too much but I haven’t used it.

                  Metal tools you need to really scrape at it to remove the coating, I don’t think it is something you could do by mistake.

                  • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    Makes sense! All this is secondhand knowledge from a bunch of friends who are cooks for a living, so not based on any personal experiences, maybe probably should’ve clarified that earlier lol

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Sure but what us the downside? It us a huge field with everything from local to requiring the cloud. You can’t blanket it all together.

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        We use it when, for any reason, a person who would could easily use something related to their field, doesn’t use it. What it means is that if someone who could be using something because they know how it works, isn’t using it, there must be a reason.

        • djmikeale@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          We have a similar saying in Denmark, something like “shoemakers kids always have holes in their shoes” but in this case it’s more about that the people in the profession don’t prioritize their own craft. I’ve seen this with electricians where whole house is done but electrical sockets aren’t installed but for IT I think it’s more about distrust towards developers (takes one to know one)

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Ahh, the impression I got is that one makes it sound like they are avoiding it because they can’t be bothered to while the other actively avoids it because its bad.

          • Mesa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I think that is the most “correct” interpretation of it. Maybe they’re saying that it’s been bent over time.