• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This all starts when it becomes clear Ukraine has mineral rights that threaten Russia’s ability to lean on Western Europe to the extent it does/did.

    The NATO claims are just cover. Even if they were true Russia has zero right to determine Ukraine’s future.

    It’s weird to see “leftists” endorse imperialism while attempting to claim any kind of morality.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, it started a lot longer ago than that. Russia has maintained for decades now that NATO encirclement is a red line, and that included Ukraine. I’m not “endorsing” anything here, but explaining the cause of the war. Russia is interested in having a buffer zone against NATO, the US is interested in profiteering in the form of loans and mineral rights, and the ruling class of Ukraine is interested in gettting rich off of sending young people to die in a preventable war.

      This isn’t a war of “righteousness” or anything, it isn’t good vs evil, but 3 countries with different interests and the Ukrainian people ending up with by far the shortest end of the stick.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          I could, but I think it’s more important to look at what’s actually truly relevant. NATO/Russian relations don’t go nearly that far back.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Regardless of what Putin personally wants, Russia acts in the interests of its material conditions. Putin is a Nationalist, so his interests in maintaining a buffer from NATO generally align with the Russian public.

              • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 minutes ago

                acts in the interests of its material conditions

                It’s a foundational mistake of Marxists to reduce everything to material conditions. You will never understand the world, if that’s your only frame of reference.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 minutes ago

                  I don’t reduce everything to material conditions, but I also don’t believe in “Great Man Theory” either.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To be clear Im talking about many of the other leftists that are celebrating Putin’s invasions/actions not just you specifically

        Russia has no right to demand a buffer zone and they have had plans to retake Ukraine for years as you always had that cadre of nutjobs going back to Zhirinovsky that would comment on the need to rebuild the empire. I believe they just found the right circumstances to take advantage of the situation.

        No war is about morality and the only side with anything resembling a moral claim at all are those invaded.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t see what discussing the morality of the invasion will practically solve, nor the insistence on Russia not actually caring about NATO and instead wanting minerals. The reason it’s important to accurately identify the cause of war is so that we can find a way to end it with the least harm possible, as it stands right now Ukraine is getting the rug pulled from under them and will be subject to US loans and Russian victory, the worst outcome for them, period.

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Im not saying Russia doesn’t care about NATO. I have stated that it does not matter what Russia’s position is as they have no right to determine what Ukraine does despite the intense entitlement throughout Russia

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              You said it was a cover in order to grab minerals in Ukraine. I disagree, and that fundamentally changes how we analyze how to end the war.