Last year I used mainly crystal. This year I’m thinking pharo smalltalk, if I can pick it up in time

I also want to do visualizations, not sure how possible that is with smalltalk.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I skipped 2023, but in 2022 I got decently far using newer Excel functions like LET and LAMBDA. And then if I could I would golf the solution into a single cell formula. Years before 2022 I used Python. I think I had more fun with Excel. Will I be up for it this year?

  • Gobbel2000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I have previously done it in Rust, but have toyed with the idea of taking this year as a reason for looking into OCaml.

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I will try to learn rust while doing it, seems like an up and coming language with some interesting features.

    I never get past the first 10 days anyway due to how long they start to take and how many things are going on in December.

    I hate the ones that turn out to require some niche mathematical knowledge too…

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Might finally do something with Elixir. Plenty of ideas for using it with Phoenix and while I’ve seen a couple of tutorials for simple stuff like a live chat, I’ve done fuck-all thus far.

    Might try V one way or another as well. Super small compiler and very small executables make me happy.

  • andioop@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Python. I don’t have much fun in that language and I figure maybe doing AoC will help delete the mental barrier of “Python make sad” and also get me to learn more about it, so if it still makes me unhappy at least it won’t be an “I have very little understanding of what I am doing” unhappy.

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t entirely know why, but it’s difficult to enjoy programming in python, even if you enjoy the end product. Something about it’s design, which usually forces you to do things imperatively or reach for a library, it’s position as mainly a glue language, it’s philosophy of “there should only be one way to do it”. They’re practical philosophies, but not very fun

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You might have put into a words a suspicion I’ve had for a long time. I don’t know if this is completely the case for me. But yes, Python most of the times doesn’t spark joy

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      New Years resolution the past 5 years: I will get better with Rust.

      …and I do get better but somehow it always feels like it’s not enough. Like, I’m still an imposter.

      I can program an entire embedded USB keyboard/mouse firmware from scratch that can do all sorts of things no keyboard has ever done before yet I still feel like a newbie somehow. Like there’s all these people that talk about traits and mutli-threaring with async and GPU and AI stuff and I’m like, “I wrote an embedded_hal crate that lets you use both 8 and 16-channel multiplexers simultaneously!” or, “I wrote an interface that let’s you use the extra space in your RP2040 flash memory as a filesystem!”

      Yet everything I ever write in Rust always just uses the most basic and simple features because I still have trouble with complex lifetimes (passing them around quickly gets too confusing for me) and traits that work with non-basic types (because in the world of embedded 'static is king).

      • arendjr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Good news: if you’re writing #Rust and only using basic features of the language, you’re doing it right.

        People who use the advanced stuff either have unique, interesting challenges, or they’re over-engineering. Since the former are overrepresented in the blogosphere, you’re probably comparing yourself to them. But just because their problems are interesting doesn’t mean yours are not! Nor does it mean you have to use the same solutions.

        If you can solve interesting problems (it sounds like you can!) and keep the code simple, more power to you!

      • Iapar@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe you should work more on you self-esteem instead of rust?

        Doesn’t seem healthy to be good at something and not recognizing it as an accomplishment.

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Haha, well… I have plenty of self-esteem but not Rust-specific self-esteem. I still have imposter syndrome with that language.

          I’m a top notch expert in Python and JS though! 😁👍

          I wrote PyMinifier which required such a deep understanding of Python it kinda broke my brain writing it for a while, haha. I eventually figured everything out though and got an even deeper understanding of the language and its features.

          For JS it has just been years and years and years of knowing 100 ways to do what I want in JS but none ever seeming to be, “correct”. Then eventually I realized there’s no best way to do basically anything in JS and that’s when the true enlightenment came 🤣

          If you look at anyone’s JS code and think to yourself, “ugh, there’s got to be a better way to do this” chances are you’re wrong. All the ways will be equally shitty for any number of different reasons! 😆

  • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Going with c# again. I know the language super well but don’t often have a chance to get really deep into it with the stuff at work. These often present very non typical problems that require lesser used features.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      C# is like a black hole for me. Ever since I started using it, I have been unable to really get into anything else.

      If I would have learned it later, I could have learned five other languages instead ( really learned, I have still played with a bunch ).

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Real programmers don’t mess time messing around with butterflies or physically interacting with the world. They just intimidate the program into acting as they want through sheer fucking will

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Really curious about how’d unsupervised AutoGPT handle it. Will probably require making some kind of agent that handles input and feedback loop, and it will definitely be a disaster, but could be interesting exercise.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t code enough to justify investing time and energy into becoming fluent in a new language, andd habits die hard, so… perl. It does what I need it to do, and it is so thoroughly embedded in the back of my head that it’s extremely rare that I have to look something up when writing.

  • wer2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like to use lisp. It is about the only time I get to use it, and I get a little better each year.

    • LitanysA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Last year i did rust and lisp both, lisp most of the time was easier.