• Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember this energy when a fucking AI does it.

    Edit: this isn’t pro AI, it’s pro who gives a fuck about the author, just to be clear.

      • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m for progress. Anyone with any decent edification on the subject knows that what we call “AI” is an LLM. The point is I don’t care if a solution comes from any source, be it the mathematical proofs LLMs have found, or a piece of software made by the furriest of furrys.

        • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m for progress.

          But that doesnt mean anything

          You could call any controversial idea “pro {something good}” or “anti {something bad}”

    • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      AI don’t think or have feelings (it’s debatable whether they’re even AI or that’s just marketing BS). False equivalency.

      • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        “AI” is kind of like the “No True Scotsman” fallacy. We’ve been through how many cycles of “If a computer can do <this>, it must be AI.” *Make a computer that does <this>.* “That isn’t how I meant. Now, if it can do <this>…” Of course, people have a hard time describing sentience and sapience, so why would it be a surprise that we have a hard time deciding if what we built sufficiently mimics them?

        • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it. We haven’t come to it. It’s just a complexified chatbot they’re calling AI for marketing purposes.

          • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If a term is used for decades to describe something, you would assume it is the thing being described

            • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Just because they put a picture of a cherry pie on a crisco can for decades doesn’t mean you should call crisco “cherry pie”.