In a unanimous judgment for Cox Communications, the Court ruled that an ISP is contributorily liable for user infringement "only if it intended that the provided service...
It’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while…
Yes
It’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
ISP has more money than music industry