cm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 7 months agoSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up11cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11external-linkSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comcm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square6linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.ml
minus-squareleoj@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoI think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while…
minus-squareWizard3964@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoISP has more money than music industry
minus-squarecm0002@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoIt’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while…
ISP has more money than music industry
It’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
Yes