• QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I mean it sounds like you are being willfully obtuse about the concept of colloquial language vs jargon for the sake of being a dick on the internet to strangers

      • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So do you feel that it is okay to do literally whatever you want to a creature just because it is not capable of complex understanding or having the ability to make an informed decision?

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think cruelty is bad. but just killing nonhumans is probably fine. killing them for food, clothing and medicine is absolutely acceptable. breeding them for food clothing and medicine is also acceptable.

          • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Do you feel that the meat industry in its current form is cruel or no? As opposed to hunting and/or typical ranching and animal husbandry

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I don’t think I’m informed enough to have an opinion the whole industry but I live in a rural area and know plenty of farmers. I don’t think they’re cruel to their livestock.

              • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I don’t think I’m informed enough to have an opinion on whether artificially inseminating an animal when it appears to be resisting is cruel, or not—but if you are self aware enough to admit that then consider that causing an animal undue stress and/or pain seemingly against it’s will may be on a level of cruelty that you may have not considered, and is part of a system that may no longer be necessary due to our current level of technology as it was in the past. They used to not anesthetize babies for surgery because it was widely believed that they couldn’t feel pain, now we know better than that.

                It sounds like you may be making an assumption that might makes right, and just because we are more complex and intelligent than other creature that somehow means our lives are inherently worth more than theirs and that innately gives us the right to kill animals for food and resources—despite having the ability to no longer depend on that as our ancestors did. That or you possibly believe that we were given divine agency to do so, idk. I say all this as someone who currently consumes meat. It’s just something to consider

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  our lives are inherently worth more

                  I certainly think people are more important than non-people. but there is no such thing as inherent worth. worthiness is a value statement, and is subjective.

                  • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    I realize you didn’t use the words “might makes right”, but that is essentially what you are saying when you say our live are more important. Why do you think they are more important? Because of our intelligence? Would that mean that the lived of a more intelligent species would be worth more than our own? And if so, why do you think that? Do you think it would give them the right to eat us? I’m not saying I disagree with you that a human is more important per se, but I can’t really imagine a truly justifiable why reason it would be that doesn’t rely on logical fallacy and superstition

          • ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I think it’s bc you don’t actually believe the ridiculous shit you’re saying. you don’t actually think sawing off a table leg carries the same moral weight as slicing through a cow’s throat; or that animals can’t have preferences or are unable to dislike being confined or abused. just unhinged shit that gives away that the last thing you’re capable of is having an honest look at your habits. unless you actually think that shit, in which case you should be kept away from animals, children, and any other vulnerable person.