Yeah I’m pretty sure you’re gonna want to do a little more research about religion in Nazi Germany before continuing this line of reasoning because… Lol
following the precepts of Christ, Muhammed and Buddha when they perpetrated colonialist slaughter all over eastern Europe and Russia.
You might also want to actually read these books, because all three of them explicitly condone genocide.
Edit: Missed Buddha, I was referring to the three Abrahamic religions.
Not sure why you brought up Buddha, but Buddhism isn’t exempt. Just look at Myanmar.
Yeah I’m pretty sure you’re gonna want to do a little more research
Let’s do that, then.
Wikipedia entry on Heinrich Himmler -
Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler, himself a former Roman Catholic, was one of the main promoters of the Gottgläubig faith.[2] He was particularly hostile towards Christianity, its values, the churches, and their clergy.[2] Himmler viewed all of Christianity and the priesthood as nothing but an indecent union, with the majority of its priesthood constituting “an erotic homosexual league of men” whose only purpose was to create and maintain a “twenty-thousand-year-old Bolshevism.”[2] To the Reichsführer-SS Christianity was the greatest plague delivered by history, and he demanded that it be dealt with accordingly.[2] A perennial favorite song of the storm troopers had this refrain: "Storm Trooper Comrades, hang the Jews and put the priests against the wall.
Hold on… I need to repost this part -
To the Reichsführer-SS Christianity was the greatest plague delivered by history, and he demanded that it be dealt with accordingly.
Sounds a lot like some of the hysterical edgelords on here, don’t you think?
If you’re going to try and use history to prop up your shittakes, edgelord, you shouldn’t be surprised when somebody who knows a whole lot more of it than you show up to accept the challenge.
If you want to define religion as “edgy hippy shit”, then I guess. And yes, people regularly launch screeds against paganist religions and occultist religions all the time.
But your sad attempts at insults and trolling could be good, if you at least put a little effort into them. Try making coherent sentences, as a starter.
This is so sad. I used to think that people using bots to troll others was the lowest of the low on the internet, but you’ve taught me that there’s someone who can put even more of their time, but somehow less effort into it.
“no, u” at least has some historical context if you do it right, which adds humor, but you can’t even pull that off properly.
Yeah I’m pretty sure you’re gonna want to do a little more research about religion in Nazi Germany before continuing this line of reasoning because… Lol
You might also want to actually read these books, because all three of them explicitly condone genocide.
Edit: Missed Buddha, I was referring to the three Abrahamic religions.
Not sure why you brought up Buddha, but Buddhism isn’t exempt. Just look at Myanmar.
Let’s do that, then.
Wikipedia entry on Heinrich Himmler -
Hold on… I need to repost this part -
Sounds a lot like some of the hysterical edgelords on here, don’t you think?
If you’re going to try and use history to prop up your shittakes, edgelord, you shouldn’t be surprised when somebody who knows a whole lot more of it than you show up to accept the challenge.
Himmler was a paganist and occultist. You should read up on things before you talk about them.
So just… edgy hippy shit, eh?
Do tell… do you edgelords regularly launch screeds against those, too?
If you want to define religion as “edgy hippy shit”, then I guess. And yes, people regularly launch screeds against paganist religions and occultist religions all the time.
But your sad attempts at insults and trolling could be good, if you at least put a little effort into them. Try making coherent sentences, as a starter.
Strange… I don’t see edgelord atheists doing that at all. Mind showing me some examples?
Nooo… mine looks perfectly coherent. Can’t say the same for you, though.
This is so sad. I used to think that people using bots to troll others was the lowest of the low on the internet, but you’ve taught me that there’s someone who can put even more of their time, but somehow less effort into it.
“no, u” at least has some historical context if you do it right, which adds humor, but you can’t even pull that off properly.
Speaking of poeple who “can’t even pull that off properly” - will you be taking long with those examples?
They’re right there. I don’t get how it can be so hard for people to read what is on the page.