Interesting history and analysis of SMTP’s history. How can we prevent fedi and other open protocols from suffering the same fates?

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not sure what you mean with that or how it relates to what I said, could you elaborate?

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nono, I’m saying it costs to spam because spammers have to keep buying new domains as their previous domains get blocked or defederated.

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why don’t they use existing domains? I don’t think 100% of them require a phone number. And didn’t know it’s possible to defederate an email provider.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, my point is that if spammers were to spam on the fediverse, they’d need to buy new domains constantly as their previous domains are defederated, I’m not talking about email.

            • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              So you’re offering a system that requires the instance/provider admins to manually federate with others instead of the federation being enabled by default?

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’re misunderstanding me again. Please try reading what I said again.

                I’m not suggesting allowlist federation, though that is another tactic that could be used. I’m just saying that a spammer on the fediverse would be quickly defederated and would have to buy a new domain to keep spamming, which would probably be too expensive to justify.

                • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes, mister/miss, I read your comments again and I admit I did completely misunderstand you. I’m sorry for that and I’m extremely grateful you chose to explain your point in a friendly manner instead of starting a drama or acting in a toxic manner.

          • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            And didn’t know it’s possible to defederate an email provider.

            It absolutely is, your mail provider “de-federates” aka blocks mail from plenty of other e-mail providers.