• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Interesting, considering (motorized) public transit is not that old, and bikes are even newer (cca 80 and 20 years prior to the automobile, respectively, depending on location)

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I wouldn’t call it lying. The traditional means of transportation is walking, people have been doing it for thousands of years.

        • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          Unfortunately, conservatives are known to claim that things that have been happening for thousands of years are actually new

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I know people do that and while this reframing is not exactly a lie, it’s interesting it works even when they are lumping walking (Homo erectus) and buses, trains, trams and presumably bikes (all 19ᵗʰ century) while excluding cars (basically early 20ᵗʰ century)

        • Mr.Chewy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If all transport was bikes, trains and trams - you most likely still can get everywhere by foot. If all transport was cars - not neccessarily; is what I think is the main thing that separates it from straight up deception