Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        i486 is an antique now. It’s an artifact more expensive than less-ancient PCs.

        It would require quite an expert to setup with a 7.X kernel, especially with network access.

        I’m all for old hardware support, but there’s basically no scenario where this hurts anyone struggling to get by.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No “poors” are running a 486. You would take the best part of and hour to boot a modern distro on a 66MHz (that’s 0.066GHz for you kids) 486. That’s if it would boot at all - which it likely wouldn’t.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re using a 30+ year old computer in the modern day, you’ve already sacrificed security.

        The price and availability of a 15 year old computer is almost the same as a 30 year old computer, you can get a fully functional 1st gen i5 PC that will sprint circles around the highest end 90’s PC for $40. Honestly, most people are just e-wasting computers that old, I’m sure you could easily get them for free, hell, lots of people would pay you to take them off their hands.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Like they would run on a i368 or i468 cpu. Thats pentium 2, at least. And guess what, those are still supported ( basically pentium 1 and up )

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m pretty sure any Rpi is more powerful, smaller, and more efficient than any computer hardware from 30 years ago lol.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Less than the cost of the power of running a 35 year old CPU for a year I’m pretty sure. They still have to pay for electricity in the third world. And wages. If your employees take a bunch of extra time to do really simple things on the computer, that also costs money.

          Could also probably get a couple grand for a working i486 PC at this point, it’s a museum piece.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No - nobody is still using one that would be running a modern distro. Anyone relying on hardware this old is already managing their own ecosystem of software.

      We’re talking about computers that have clock speeds in the megahertz range FFS. They’re slower than an ESP32 and take a lot more power.

      Nothing of value was lost.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe, but I think that they will not upgrade the system, even without this change there is no reason to use a 7.x kernel on a 30+ Yeats old hardware