Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like they would run on a i368 or i468 cpu. Thats pentium 2, at least. And guess what, those are still supported ( basically pentium 1 and up )

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you’re using a 30+ year old computer in the modern day, you’ve already sacrificed security.

      The price and availability of a 15 year old computer is almost the same as a 30 year old computer, you can get a fully functional 1st gen i5 PC that will sprint circles around the highest end 90’s PC for $40. Honestly, most people are just e-wasting computers that old, I’m sure you could easily get them for free, hell, lots of people would pay you to take them off their hands.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      i486 is an antique now. It’s an artifact more expensive than less-ancient PCs.

      It would require quite an expert to setup with a 7.X kernel, especially with network access.

      I’m all for old hardware support, but there’s basically no scenario where this hurts anyone struggling to get by.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No “poors” are running a 486. You would take the best part of and hour to boot a modern distro on a 66MHz (that’s 0.066GHz for you kids) 486. That’s if it would boot at all - which it likely wouldn’t.