Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren’t made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist’s first time seeing a platypus and assuming it’s an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn’t software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!
Surely there’s something better than Gimp.
Krita, definitely, though it’s still not as complete in capability it’s a much better analogue
Isn’t krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?
yes they are two different use cases.
Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren’t made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Except easily drawing circles on GIMP’s part.
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist’s first time seeing a platypus and assuming it’s an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn’t software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!