SandwichesAreNice@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agoFree alternatives to paid softwarelemmy.worldimagemessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageFree alternatives to paid softwarelemmy.worldSandwichesAreNice@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square115linkfedilink
minus-squareNefara@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·13 days agoKrita, definitely, though it’s still not as complete in capability it’s a much better analogue
minus-squareThales@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agoSeconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-212 days agoIsn’t krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoyes they are two different use cases.
minus-squareblack0ut@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoKrita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren’t made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
minus-squarelyrial@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 days agoExcept easily drawing circles on GIMP’s part.
Krita, definitely, though it’s still not as complete in capability it’s a much better analogue
Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.
Isn’t krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?
yes they are two different use cases.
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren’t made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Except easily drawing circles on GIMP’s part.