• TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Back in the dialup days when brands were first coming online I used to have quite a thing for a Toffee Crisp. When I got a bar that was noticeably smaller than the last, I emailed them expecting a reply about market forces or cost of ingredients, but maybe they’d also send a voucher for a free bar or something.

    Instead they tried to gaslight me, telling me they’d always been that size and that I must be imagining it. I was so put out by it that, other than a very occasional multi-pack for picnics, I haven’t bought a single-serve Toffee Crisp, Mars Bar, Snickers etc since.

    When shrinkflation became a recognised term I felt so vindicated! I wish I still had that email so that I could shove it in their faces.

  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This explains why I only needed to eat 1 Mars bar to feels satisfied back in the days while I now have to eat 3-4 bars.

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I clearly remember they were 68 grams when I was a kid, which always weighed on my mind when I had to choose between a Mars bar and the 78 gram Oh Henry

  • ulkesh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Factoring in 35 years of inflation. A $0.50 mars bar in 1991 is $1.21 today. The cost of a Mars bar today is at least $1.50 USD (after converting from UK pounds) and that’s being generous.

    Companies are greedier than ever and there seems to be no stopping it (meaning because of the oligarchy in the US, Congress will never do a damn thing about it, and certainly the spoiled man-baby’s executive branch will do nothing about it), and no end in sight of it.

    Fuck them all.

      • ulkesh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I was 12, so I didn’t have 3 cents to rub together, let alone 30. I assumed it was similar to candy bars when I was in high school, which were about $0.50 at the time.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I was only like 9, but I remember that shit. Lol.

          Least those were the prices here in the Midwest. Thirtyish cent candy bars, 25 cent bags of small chips, 35 cent cans of coca cola, 59 cents for a 20 ounce. If hamburger was a dollar a pound, it’s because it wasn’t on sale that week.

    • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We’ve had the technology to stop this since 1791. Arguments about maturity could be made that put an industrial version as late as 1917.

      That’s still over a century ago.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I would also be surprised if the cost of production, now using cheaper ingredients and far more automation, hadn’t also decreased.

        • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Don’t say it in cop voice. Say:

          workers engineers and scientists made everything drastically more productive and the pedophiles stole all the gains. We keep letting them.

          • Airfried@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 hours ago

            We’re saying the same thing. The productivity surplus is getting stolen by the Epstein class. I’m not trying to sugarcoat anything.

            • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I know. You were trained to say it in a way that contains linguistic ‘outs’ for boot lickers and disattributes the harm. Read back my post and look at the formatting.

  • DonkeyStar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Also, recipe blogs are a great source of information on shrinkflation. Going to the store to look for a package size that no longer exists is fun.

    • huppakee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’d sign for enshittification being the worst thing that happens this century. Considering there are years 73 ahead of us in the century, it might only be the precursor of what will actually be the word of the century.

      • Airfried@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Global warming is by far the worst thing but it leads to the same evil root of corporate greed.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think fascism is worse. I think Russia invading Ukraine is worse. I think the genocide by Israel of the Palestinians is worse. I think wealth inequality is worse. I think the lack of social safety nets in the US, especially universal heatlh case, is worse.

        Enshittification is bad, but I really don’t think it’s the worst thing.

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I could be wrong, but I believe the person to whom you replied was indicating that they would be okay with “enshittification” being the word of the century, because there are SO MANY worse things on the horizon or actively festering and spiraling out of control that, if “enshittification” is the worst thing to happen this century, that would be an acceptable outcome. I believe they were using “sign for” as in “to accept, as of a package or parcel”

    • cantaloup@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Mars bars are sold in the US under the name Milky Way. Not to be confused with what’s globally known as Milky Way, which is called 3 Musketeers in the US.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        um. the us had mars bars and they were nothing like milky ways. they were closer to snickers but with almonds.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah but Milky Ways are sold under the name Mars in other countries. Whereas Milky Way doesn’t have any of the caramel in other countries.

        • cantaloup@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah those are called Snickers Almond in the US now. Either way, whether they want a UK Mars bar like in the article or they want a pre-2003 US Mars bar, you can just buy the same thing with a different name in the US.