• printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is yesterday’s news. Destroying evidence is a crime in a lot of jurisdictions. With that in mind, I don’t understand how somebody who apparently uses Graphene OS didn’t bring an empty burner when crossing one of the most notorious borders in the world.

    Which isn’t to say that the laws that require you to unlock your phone and that throw you in jail if you securely wipe it aren’t hostile and inhumane.

    • Aequitas@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      How are they supposed to know there was evidence on it? I’m allowed to delete my files, aren’t I?

        • RQG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          This sounds a lot like proving my innocence instead of them having to prove guilt.

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Not if you’re given a Lawful Order ™ to produce that material. Whether or not that material is incriminating is irrelevant.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Be careful not to swallow your spit. They may think you’re swallowing a bomb and shoot you on the spot.

      • dadarobot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        i think it would have been different if he wiped it before he came through customs. he gave them the pin, which destroyed the data after it was requested. almost like the phone was boobytrapped.

        personally i just try to delete most of my communication apps on the plane before i get back to the states (signal, lemmy, instagram…) in case they want to search my phone and get mad about a meme. (precident). i also try to offload as much as possible to selfhosted apps where applicable (rss reader, podcasts) so i can just log back in and have everything.

        i dont know how far these searches can go, but id be worried about password managers and app store history too along with any account where you can just “log in with google” or whatever. once the device is unlocked and in their hands, they can have access to quite a bit of personal information.

        i bet theyre just pissy this technology exists and are trying to make it illegal.

      • Eggman@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        They aren’t but it is the same as if you have been accused of murdering some one and you burn the car you are accused of moving the body to the river in.

    • GMac@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      In order to be convicted of destroying evidence, there needs to be proof that there was “evidence” on the phone in the first place.

      If something on the phone is already known without doubt, then what’s the need for access? if there is doubt at the time of the wipe then there is no proof or destroying evidence. 🤷‍♂️

    • OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      If I understand correctly they didn’t actually delete anything it just shreds the encryption keys so it can’t be accessed. Idk if the difference matters a whole lot though.

      • madasi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        That is a distinction without a difference. Either way the once accessible data can no longer be accessed any longer.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        No it wipes the data from the phone

        GrapheneOS provides users with the ability to set a duress PIN/Password that will irreversibly wipe the device (along with any installed eSIMs) once entered anywhere where the device credentials are requested

        source

  • Sir G'kar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Seems like what’s needed is the ability to load an alternate profile or some kind of demo mode based on the pin. Something that looks normal but doesn’t have any info you don’t want others to see, without actually deleting anything.

    • GMac@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Dont think that would be as secure. Once a phone has been unlocked after reboot, even if it has been locked again, the operating system and ram can be accessed quite easily with the correct tools and border controls have those tools.

      Even a Graphene phone is only properly secure before first unlock after reboot. So i would not personally rely on allowing acess to any profile. I would assume its possible, (probably trivial) to gain complete access from there.

      Any duress pin use should be covered under a person’s right to avoid self incrimination.

      If the phone is owned by your employer and they are the investigation target, then you might be on dodgy ground.

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Alternately, a user profile that isn’t displayed anywhere, but accessible only through a specific PIN, maybe. Not sure how you’d explain the storage space either option used, however.

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        It should work like truecrypt used to where there’s no sign some of the encrypted blob is not actually visible in the fake os.

        • Carl@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think the point is that if you load an empty profile (no photos, no videos, no apps, etc) but your phone storage is nearly full, it could throw up a red flag.

          • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            That’s why the fake profile would not show that the storage is full. Unless they try to load lots of data onto the fake profile it would not be obvious.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Nothing is needed. Erase your shit before you travel in or out of the US.

    • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I had this feature on a Xiaomi phone that i had a few years ago. I could even set up the fingerprint reader to open a different profile depending on which finger i used.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        They didnt grow to it. Nobody just gave a shit before, because it wasnt against all skin colors.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          It’s not even about skin color, not really. It’s about poverty and people not having a chance to get out of it. I would also commit crimes if I felt my life had no future and im white.

          As a consequence, black people commit crimes and white cops become racist because they see that. But its not really about skin color if you look at the full picture.

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              It’s about poverty, yeah. White people would act the same as black people if they lived in poverty. In fact, you see that happening in America too.

              You have to give someone a chance in life or you end up with desperate people. I never understood the idea that poor people should just say no to crime when they have absolutely nothing to live for otherwise. That’s crazy.

              • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                If you don’t think racism is real and not at all based on race you are a literal fucking idiot. Try reading a fucking book whitey. Fanon, George Jackson, Malcom X. Take you pick, not sure you’ll have the comprehension to understand.

  • shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    You have to carry a piece of paper in your wallet that contains a PIN. The piece of paper contains no further information, just a PIN. You decline to answer any questions regarding this piece of paper or your phone’s PIN.

    This might not be a good idea, depending on your jurisdiction.

    • Melobol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      You can have a business card with a "phone"number on it. (Your pin can be any part of that number it is only you who needs to know where to start reading the code). You don’t need to have a sus number only piece of paper. :)

      • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        The point is that the cops would find and enter the pin.

        It’s the wipe pin.

        They wiped it, not you.

  • tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Supreme court has ruled that warrantless phone search at the border is bogus, but theyre too shitpantsed to stick with it

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      they are evil and hypocritical is what they are.

      they want to make an example out of people trying to escape the panopticon.