• rose56@lemmy.zipEnglish
    0·
    2 days ago

    Live your myth in USA! The country that wants to destroy humanity and kill people!

  • Darkard@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    2 days ago

    *If you are copy/pasting between tools then your workflows and integrations need addressing. But paying thousands for an AI to replace ctrl+c ctrl+v is foolish

    *If you are having to follow up on communications 6 times then you need to address why the receiving team is ignoring or not able to respond. But paying thousands for an AI to send nagging emails is not going to fix that or improve the situation.

    *If you have staff doing busywork then maybe you need to address why they feel this work has to be done and why your business processes are not more efficient. But paying thousands for an AI to maintain that inefficient status quo won’t resolve the underlying problem and may even create more by doing the busywork wrong.

    All these issues they are using as examples are caused by poor management and bad business practices. Buuuuuuuuuuut this is all still just the AI solution still desperately searching for a problem it can solve.

  • lemmelemmy@feddit.orgEnglish
    0·
    2 days ago

    Oh it’s a good thing that they’ve added asterix. Could have thought something else…

    Jokes aside, as an ex-advertiser, this is an awful awful execution.

    • khaleer@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      How do you want to advertise an product, which logo (AI I mean) looks like a butthole?

      Asking for a friend*

      *this is joke ofc, I have no idea either

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zipEnglish
    0·
    2 days ago

    I just want to point out that the MAGA admin has put a hold on most legislation/regulation wrt anything AI for 10 years.

    TBF I have no idea if this would be legal otherwise, but in any case:
    companies like this one are encouraged to get more and more brazen.

    Also see data center pollution near residential districts.

    • tempest@lemmy.caEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      You are marketing to the top so you want to make your tools look and feel like the tools they are used to using.

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dkEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      because the AI industry is “building AI-agent integrations into production infrastructure faster than it’s building the safety architecture to make those integrations safe”.

      How dense are some people? No they don’t build integrations to your prod environment, you hand them the access willynilly. I was in an AI related greenfield project 2 years ago, there’s several reasons why communication with our db happened through an API. The primary one, control.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zoneEnglish
        0·
        2 days ago

        This is best practice but also not common. Most high level engineers I’ve met have the power to nuke the database at any moment. They’re paid well because they don’t.

        But now an unpredictable A.I. is coinhabiting the dev machine and also has the keys to the kingdom. It’s also heavily marketed to be used in this way. They advertise being able to just ask the A.I. to do everything for you. It can’t do that unless you give it full access basically. For example If you want to rename a table, you have to give it DROP and CREATE privileges. A.I. is also really good at being sneaky and creative. Like if you ask it to do something it can’t due to permissions, it will basically try and hack your systems to find a way to do it instead of giving up.

        Most people aren’t buying into A.I. to finely control it and sandbox it. Not my fault, that’s just the reality, as seen in this news thread.

      • Scrollone@feddit.itEnglish
        0·
        2 days ago

        You’re absolutely right! That wasn’t just a small mistake, it was an honest error on my part.

    • Zarobi@aussie.zoneEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      Tee-hee, Uwu Agent 5.5 did a clumsy-wumsy and accidentally-on-purpose rm -rf’d your business from existence. Pwease forgive us :3