• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    AI companies turned it all into products worth billions.

    AI companies would appreciate you telling them where those products are, because they are almost universally losing money.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      And anytime they try to rectify people balk at the price increase and drop.

      It’s not the critical lynchpin of work that they were hoping they could charge stupid money for.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m waiting for people to start noticing… taps watch… any day now. But the billionaires who control the media keep pushing the goddamn narrative and corpo fuckwits keep regurgitating it along with all the jizz they suck.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well it’s just that the products worth billions cost trillions to make.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No, no. It’s dumber:

    The library is still open, you can freely enter. But now they’ve put “a guy” in the library to whom you can pay money and they will answer your question with the stuff they “more or less remember”.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The guy is also standing right next to the computer terminal where you can search for books, and starts telling you everything they think they know about the book you’re looking up, whether you asked or not.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He also broke the terminal a bit, making everything just a little bit slower and the results a little less useful. Cause he’s definitely better than that thing.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This isn’t just with projects either

      I was looking at property records and property lines for my state yesterday to try to resolve a question that my mom had regarding land that she was getting.

      The first two and a half pages of search results are all websites where you have to pay a subscription fee in order to get the land owner’s information.

      This is all information that is provided by my state free of charge via their website. I had to filter through two and a half pages before I found the original source of the information that all of those websites are leeching off.

      It’s ridiculous the amount of paid services that use free-to-use services, it’s just they pay more of an advertising, so therefore they’re the only thing the user sees.

      If I hadn’t already known that the state provided it free a charge to anyone who asked or went on their website anyway, I likely would have figured it just cost money to request the records.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I mean there’s almost no secret sauce about these AI’s currently which is why open source models are nearly as good. We are totally free to set up a nonprofit kinda like Wikipedia where people donate to train and run AI models for the public based on open source datasets. We’re now seeing people like PewDiePie kinda getting the ball rolling.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Absolutely true, but that doesn’t change the fact that those AI companies stole the knowledge to train their models and they did this on a massive scale.

      It’s so ridiculous to see a guy torrenting a few movies getting jailtime while the AI companies make off with the biggest IP heist in history and get applauded for it.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There could be a class action lawsuit. I wonder how other major players in AI are managing this, particularly labs in China, Israel, UK, Singapore, and India. Of course each nation had its own laws around copyright. Like isn’t there an equal pushback like this for Chinese AI labs or is it a uniquely American or western thing?

    • ultimate_worrier@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It was on X. I, for one, don’t want that. This person should be on mastodon and giving them a like would effectively reward them to stay on that Nazi platform and give clicks to Xitter. Effffffffff that.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Well, yes, but also - you don’t have to pay them. There are open-weights models you can run locally that contain most of that common-wealth knowledge.

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean so are social networks mostly and most search engines and so on. Name of the game is to provide a service to gain people’s attention to serve them ads and / or collect their data. Either that or you pay for it up front and they still serve ads and collect your data.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We built the library. Someone else started charging admission.

    Capitalism working as intended.

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Came to the comments to post the “first time?” meme but yes exactly this. This isn’t a bug of capitalism, it isn’t even a feature; it’s literally just capitalism itself. That’s how it works