• ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’ve got it all backwards. In an ideal capitalist world, the greedy software nonprofit foundations bleed the innovative corporations of their well-earned revenue.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, they are now charging by usage. They will either end up with boatloads of money while people still have ChatGPT integrated into their workflows, or they will end up with zero money as people either switch to other models or realize that AI was a shit idea all along.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, they are now charging by usage.

        Not the actual cost… they are still losing money even in their most expensive tiers. There is just no path to profitability with ANY of the current models, they simply cost more to run than the people they are supposedly trying to replace

        • criss_cross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Also business customers are fleeing in droves because they’re forcing API only pricing for businesses and everyone is getting sticker shock at the costs.

        • Womble@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          FWIW the general consensus is that they are just about making a profit on selling it by the token (as opposed to the subscriptions which are massively subsidised) so long as you pretend that capital expenses and R&D aren’t real and at some point they could stop doing them in order to make profit.

          That is very much not a given, with all the labs in a death march to not let the others get better than them and take their lunch, and open source only 9-18 months behind the closed models.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            FWIW the general consensus is that they are just about making a profit

            This is what the tech bros claim (which is obviously convenient so they can lure more suckers investors in); every outside pundit concludes otherwise

            Check this article I received yesterday… in a nutshell, if a company returns less than 7% on investment, they would normally be liquidated by investors. To make it to 7%, AI companies would have to reach a revenue of $2 TRILLION per year (cumulative amongst the big AI players, which are like 5 total)

            Last leaked financials from OpenAI showed $13 Billion revenue and a $21 billion loss

            • Womble@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Your link is broken.

              Yes, judging them now the big AI companies are terrible businesses, they are just about, maybe, marginally profitable if they stop the huge fixed expenses which they cant stop because of their environment.

              The gamble is that AI will increase in usage, while becoming more efficient and resisting becoming commoditised. I don’t think there’s a strong chance of all three of those happening, but if they did that would justify them losing money now in order to make big profits later. That’s the gamble.

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Your link is broken.

                Sorry about that, here is another https://archive.ph/3V0oc

                The gamble is that AI will increase in usage, while becoming more efficient and resisting becoming commoditised.

                But again we already know that is impossible since the economies of scale do not work. Each extra user means a shit ton of extra processing in those Data Centers and, even disregarding the destruction of the planet, nobody will pay that cost just to get 35% hallucinations in their queries.

                Right now, they are literally gambling with the IPOs that they hype will last long enough for them to cash out and let pension plans and other large automated index investors holding the bag.

                This Xmas may not be merry at all…