• 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I would buy this if westerners applied the same nuance to states under imperialist siege, but of course they never have that nuance.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I agree that the situation isn’t treated with nuance, typically, by westerners. But in this case, this isn’t particularly nuanced or naïve - it’s just a statement of fact that the parliament has voted repeatedly to extend martial law.

      That doesn’t mean Ukraine is a super-democratic country. It only means that it is the case that the government, made up of elected representatives (and yes, Ukraine banned 11 political parties for alleged Russian ties - one of them with ~10% of parliamentary seats - so the representativeness of the legislature is certainly debatable) has voted to not allow presidential elections until the war is over.

      Obviously it’d take a much longer explanation to capture all of the relevant geopolitical context, but this is a factually accurate statement about what is happening, yes?