First of all, how do you not have diabetes drinking that much Kool-Aid? Second if a serial rapist rapes a serial killer who is the good guy between the two of them? Trump claims to have very different support numbers than reality shows and in a dictatorship being publicly against the regime is a great way to accidentally fall out of a window down and onto a bunch of bullets or somehow get polonium poisoning for some reason. A whataboutism is a great way to distract from the issues at hand but just because the US has a bunch of issues with democracy doesn’t mean china doesn’t have issues, and denying them with state propaganda (an appeal to authority) with arguable levels of factuality doesn’t negate the issue.
You’re arguing against numbers published by Harvard. None of what I said is “Kool-Aid.” Secondly, using publicly funded information is not an “appeal to authority,” saying someone knows xyz because they are a specialist in something is an appeal to authority (and that isn’t a fallacy).
First of all, how do you not have diabetes drinking that much Kool-Aid? Second if a serial rapist rapes a serial killer who is the good guy between the two of them? Trump claims to have very different support numbers than reality shows and in a dictatorship being publicly against the regime is a great way to accidentally fall out of a window down and onto a bunch of bullets or somehow get polonium poisoning for some reason. A whataboutism is a great way to distract from the issues at hand but just because the US has a bunch of issues with democracy doesn’t mean china doesn’t have issues, and denying them with state propaganda (an appeal to authority) with arguable levels of factuality doesn’t negate the issue.
You’re arguing against numbers published by Harvard. None of what I said is “Kool-Aid.” Secondly, using publicly funded information is not an “appeal to authority,” saying someone knows xyz because they are a specialist in something is an appeal to authority (and that isn’t a fallacy).