It could also be a warning against importing foreign workers to build ambitious projects because social cohesion could collapse.

(This is not meant as an argument against a pluralistic society)

Is there a way that I can enforce this as root to all of my users?

Still the future I want. Stealing doesn’t matter if there are enough free hats. Not having to be responsible for property would be nice.

Isn’t therapy there to be able to heal and not to forget? The last session should mean that the client is not traumatised again.

The expectation of retaliation for not paying is a perfect setup. The decline of the card could be intentional, just for the client to realize in a deeply emotional situation that the dark memory doesn’t hurt anymore. The wide eyes, I want to believe that it comes from the bewilderment that the familiar, expected pain is gone.

Thanks. I should have known.

To your believes: Welcome to the end of the Sovjet Union.

We are living in a consumer society because people want to be free without being free. Which interestingly allows ‘libertarians’ to exist because common workers don’t want to be quotation-mark-free libertarians and defend their freedom.

I like how the development of the word makes your point. The word lost its meaning and became kind of an insult. How can the working class not be grifted when they lose the words to analyze their situation?

The problem with tyranny.gov is that the ‘libertarians’ of today will become the officers and ministers of tyranny.gov. So instead of calling them ‘libertarians’ we should call them something else or everything will stay the same just with new names.

Then they are not libertarians but something else. This doesn’t make those people less problematic, though.

As the name implies, libertarians want to be free.

Tyranny.gov rules by law which prohibits what you are allowed to do and thus think, thus limiting freedom.

Tyranny.com has no laws, just costs, which can be restructured by a single person. Thus the person feels free.