Technically: yes. The ERC primitive can act as a verification key. All identity data stays off-chain at the platform layer. The protocol anchors the proof, not the data. That said it’s possible if done with discipline and no PII on-chain. Similar like in the CUT protocol, the token isn’t access to the files, it’s authorization to access the decryption key of the files. 👍

Before dismiss anything based on assumptions it is actually possible to verify that this isn’t a AI account. Knowing is better then assuming. 😉 In opposite to a “AI-account” I’m not good at human interaction. Always same result: they’re looking at me, nod their head like they understand. But I see in their eyes they don’t. I just hope that others understand what I’m trying to communicate. But on the other hand the “good catch” is very AI-suspicious. How can I know you’re not 2 AI-accounts that want this dismissed?

Thanks for the link fix, and the appreciation.

Existing platforms settle real-world transactions too, but the rails they run on are owned and operated by someone. That operator can raise fees, gate access, extract data, be acquired, be regulated into compliance, or be pressured by any sufficiently motivated actor. The settlement behavior is only as neutral as the operator chooses to be. These protocols have no operator. The fee is immutable at the protocol layer. The contracts are deployed with renounced ownership. There is no entity that can modify the behavior, no platform that can be captured, and no intermediary between the user and the settlement rail.