Technically this is also possible with for loops, like with OpenMP
Technically this is also possible with for loops, like with OpenMP
Compiler optimizations like function inlining are your friend.
Especially in functional languages, there are a lot of tricks a compiler can use to output more efficient code due to not needing to worry about possible side effects.
Also, in a lot of cases the performance difference does not matter.
Also surely a lot of people would know tar -Create Ze Vucking File and/or tar -Xtract Ze Vucking File
You mean that instead of having a binary blob you have a generator for the data?
Depends on how deep down the rabbit hole you want to go :p
Dogmatic statements like this lead to bad, messy code. I’m a firm believer that you should use whatever style fits the problem most.
Although I agree most code would be better if people followed this dogma, sometimes mutability is just more clean/idiomatic/efficient/…
In functional programming, everything is seen as a mathematical function, which means for a given input there is a given output and there can be no side effects. Changing a variable’s value is considered a side effect and is thus not possible in pure functional programming. To work around this, you typically see a lot of recursive and higher order functions.
Declaring all values as const values is something you would do if you’re a diehard functional programmer, as you won’t mutate any values anyway.
Reed hucks = redux Heather net = ethernet
Oh no, strangers on the internet know I had sex and there were dog-like noises! That’s the exact same as people who know me IRL such as family or coworkers! I shall now sink through the ground in shame!
Is that just like the shared memory model of parallel computing or are there any added complications? Have you done this before? Please do share your experiences if so cause now I’m interested :p
FreeRTOS tasks are basically processes, IIRC other rtoses have similar mechanics too
if(condition) statement; Is valid in typical C-style syntax.
if condition { … }
Is invalid in typical C-style syntax
Is there any reason why you didn’t just switch the keyboard layout to US if that’s what you’re used to?
I switched to US at some point because many if the keys for programming were just so much easier to access. If I have to use a pc for any decent amount of time, I just switch the OS layout to US now regardless of the layout that’s printed on the keyboard.
Context: I’m european. I know for sure the people at my local coffee shops are being paid a living wage, cause there’s laws for that.
Paying your employees a living wage is included in what I see as “a sustainable business model”.
I know the owner of my local coffee shop personally and while they charge €4 or more depending on the coffee you’re getting AND they roast their own coffee, so they cut down on the bean costs significantly while generating some extra profits as well by selling the beans, they still aren’t “just raking it in” as you make it seem.
A coffee from a coffee shop definitely should be $4 if you want them to ethically source good coffee and have a sustainable business model.
There’s still cheap, shitty coffee that’s built on modern slavery there’s always like mcdo. SB is the same quality ingredients but with knowing how to steam milk + syrups
several languages that are still in use have eager evaluation.
I’m a dumb programmer. The more I need to keep implicit behaviour in mind, the higher the probability I’m writing bugs. Short circuit evaluation is an optimization technique IMO and shouldn’t be relied upon for control flow.
The aggressive tone you’re using is completely unnecessary and immature, so I’ll refrain from responding any further. Have a nice day.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-circuit_evaluation
Yes I am serious.
That’s behaviour that’s just part of language design. If you rely on it you should probably check how the language you’re using handles it.
relying on that behaviour sounds a lot like “clever” (read unnecessarily unreadable) code
Nope, IaaS. With a VPS you are in charge of everything except for the hardware. PaaS the only thing you’re in charge of is your code.
While you do have a fair point, I was referring to the case where one is basically implementing a map operation as a for loop.