I agree and always write it like that at first, but it’s also true that for example fifty kilodollars (50k$) just looks better as $50k

…although it might just be silly enough that it works…

One could argue there aren’t enough pixels and the artist just “filled in the blanks”

Ah, nice! I tried to avoid powershell while on windows, so don’t know much about it.

You can get all the IDs using yt-dlp

yt-dlp --flat-playlist --print id <playlist>

Assuming you’re on linux, you can add >> ids_all.txt at the end to save the list to a file.

You can also add

--compat-options no-youtube-unavailable-videos

to get only the list of available videos instead and then, again assuming you’re on linux, do

diff ids_all.txt ids_available.txt

to get the odd ones out. That’s the simplest I could come up with. You’ll have to hope you can use the wayback machine, or a good old exact search to turn up what video that ID actually referred to

Will you marry me?

free =/= free

OP means libre software, as opposed to “shitty bloated proprietary software”

I think the DF creator said he would open source it when he is finished or no longer able to work on it (i.e.: dead), but we’ll see how that goes.

There’s a million alternatives that do the exact same thing. Fastfetch is just better, since it’s still maintained, and not painfully slow. I used to think neofetch being slow was kind of cute. Then I switched to fastfetch, and now I can’t bear the years neofetch takes to run.

what are your strategies against such sites tracking you?

Close and never go there again. If I’m bit enough times, it goes in the hosts file for blocking. If I really need the stuff on there, I try archived versions on web.archive.org or archive.today

Mint handled my 1060 really well and it’s really good on arch too with the newer driver. Still just running Xorg with cinnamon, though. I guess mileage still varies with this stuff.

Is it HURD’n’ time?

My buddy was in a class doing a programming test. It was a couple minutes until turn in time, so he went to zip up the source files. He had already ran the appropriate zip command previously, so he pressed up three times and then enter. It appears he had miscalculated, because the command that ran was rm *.c. There were no backups.

My point was that it’s not so much “fair reasoning” as just a statement of that fact.

That’s just saying “we want to sell access to our code, so we can’t make it open source”. Basically the definition of proprietary software, no?

I am forever at war with spider mites and neem oil is my Mercy holding out her hand.

If you’re getting rid of a (rusty) drive and it leaves your hands with the cool magnets and shiny frisbees still inside, you’re doing something wrong.