- 2 Posts
- 53 Comments
“The default application launcher in Ubuntu is provided by GNOME Shell, offering a full-screen grid of icons — but it isn’t to everyone’s tastes.”
It’s like Windows in a window. Not just Windows, but you can run many other operating systems in a VM too.
“We like the clean design and improved performance of Microsoft’s latest operating system, but it still suffers from its fair share of issues. Here’s what people gripe about the most.”
And they don’t even mention the ads or that Recall garbage
thing that takes screenshotsbeing forced on you even though the public made it obvious they don’t want that. That and all the telemetry; it’s pretty much spyware disguised as an operating system.I’m sure there are more things but those are just the ones off the top of my head.
*Edit: I remembered the name of Recall
8·1 month agoThe shareholders, mostly.
Why? What’s inaccurate about it? I have no idea and would like to learn.
6·2 months agoI’m not saying I agree with their justification but I could see why they might be collecting yet another data point: education level. If someone constantly uses a calculator for simple calculations they might have a low education level. People in that demographic will be served different ads than more educated people.
It sucks, but I could see Google doing that.
Are you really trying to pretend that that’s why you’re voting for Trump? Cute.
Solidarity? It seems a bit excessive:
- Trump Supporters Wore Diapers at Rallies? (snopes.com, May 2024)
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
They did:
- Trump Supporters Wore Diapers at Rallies? (snopes.com, May 2024)
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
They did:
- Trump Supporters Wore Diapers at Rallies? (snopes.com, May 2024)
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
Next instruction: eat a porkchop. You’re looking a bit peckish.
Here’s an article on the Heritage Foundation’s website explaining why they want to help him:
You are just assuming their intentions based on nothing. Why is your assumption more valid than anyone else?
“You guys literally just claim things without any evidence”
How ironic…
You, just a few comments ago:
“that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it”
If you’re so sure of their intent then where is your evidence?
You’re doing the exact same thing you accused the other commenter of; you literally just claimed something without any evidence.
I just looked and I had 1234 comments.