Well, most of those I could at some point agree on just, but definitely not free. And the USSR in particular i would not say just either. Holodomor and all that.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Those being anarchists, not socialists. There have been shitloads of anarchist communes working perfectly, until some external force fucks them up or reclaims the land or whatever.
I asked specifically for socialist ones.
What do you mean patriot?
So, which part is the just and free part that you mention, outside of the theory? As in, in detail, practical examples of those freedoms and justice, please. Besides the theoritscl “to each according to their needs, from each according to their possibilities” (sorry if misstranslated), what practical examples have been just and free throughout time.
Name one single socialist revolution that didn’t start as a violent dictatorship. You can’t.
h3rmit@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anywayEnglish
0·22 days agoI personally do not care, I usually do not want to go into communities/places where I’m not welcome. But disceiminating basing on gender, sex, sexuality, race, ideology, etc… usually frowned upon.
I just find that double standard quite pronounced.
h3rmit@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anywayEnglish
0·22 days agoYeah, men should go to the back of that bus right?

Not really, I’m reading more about them, aside from the USSR and Cuba I’m not that familiar aside from some general knowledge in them. Neither Cuba nor the USSR I would consider free. Just is debatable, but I can see the point. But I should probably read more about the rest of the examples