2FAS is open source and doesn’t have a cloud presence to store data. You can use it to add 2FA to your other services as well.
2FAS is open source and doesn’t have a cloud presence to store data. You can use it to add 2FA to your other services as well.
Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
No one said anything is beneath senior employees.
It’s a lost opportunity when you, a staff engineer, spend your time doing something that a junior engineer could do – instead of doing a task a junior engineer can’t do.
It’s faulty, short-sighted logic though. If every company trained juniors, only for them to jump ship in two years, there’d be a pool of trained juniors to hire from. Yes you wouldn’t get your investment out of that particular person, but you’d be hiring someone else’s investment.
Beyond that, there’s work that is better suited to more junior employees because it’s literally a waste of the senior employees’ skills.
Too many industries are shitting on entry level employees now… They’re easy targets for layoffs and easy targets for AI, apparently. Now they’re already complaining about the lack of quality talent.
If you don’t invest in the next set of entry-level employees, you won’t have the next set of qualified employees.
The release notes mention why they request each one.
The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.
.
I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.
.
…it was not beneficial to me.
.
…new to gaining good visibility through open source,
“Monday”.length is working JavaScript and does equal 6. No print command afaik though.
Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they’re looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn’t that just standard American copyright?
Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.
This blog from the maintainer makes it clear they have no interest in open source other than to advertise their own skills
Thanks for your comment. I usually travel alone and was like “why would anyone subject themselves to AirBNB.” I appreciate the context and perspective.
Interesting article! I can’t tell from the post, though, is this due to a limitation on bots in Matrix or that no one has invested to make a similar bot for Matrix?
Dude also used a LLM to generate descriptions for the packages he’s serving from his package manager. And of course, it got them wrong, creating a headache for the actual package maintainers
100%
I program – yet I’ve been asked to fix a camera and Apple Maps.
They mean jank:
jan·ky adjective, informal adjective: jank
of extremely poor or unreliable quality.
"the software is pretty janky"
The things that make me a good programmer:
Even among my peers, that gives me a leg up apparently.
While we resourced mozilla.social heavily to pursue this ambitious idea,
How many people do you need to administer a Mastodon instance? I’m pretty sure infosec.exchange is like one dude.
There’s no counterpoint in that article. The article says that things should change. At no point did I say I agree with the status quo.
You’re conflating my statement of “this is how you should expect companies to act” with “this is morally right” – which was literally the point of my original post. You’re either deliberately trolling or unable to engage in a respectful conversation. Have a day!
Edit: Oh and CircleCI is a US company, so you once again tried to change the topic to fit your point. Please learn to converse in good faith. Cheers!
The library hadn’t had any updates in 2 years before this. Clearly it wasn’t maintained. If you’re a user and bothered by this super edge case “vulnerability”, fork it and take on the responsibility yourself.