A classic nerd from Norway.
I would NEVER have trusted my life to a bluetooth or wifi connection. Any IT-technician who do isn’t an IT-technician, imho.
People would take out hits on people to free an IP, if it is particularly valuable. So lets not bind it to an authors life at all.
They’ve done objective research on this?! Why aren’t we following the fuckin science? We’re discussing the rules and duration when we should be discuss how to get it past the corpos and into implemented law.
A tool that could need some sharpening. I’m all for much shorter but much stricter, I think that will help smaller ip holders more.
Well obviously. Like I said, those old ones I had was cringy as hell and I didn’t want to post them. 😅 Also the “Pepperidge Farm Remembers” meme came LONG after the Demotivational poster meme became unpopular, didn’t it? I doubt those two has been mixed before, so I had to do it.
Most Norwegians just repeat a lot of synonyms for the devil and hell and burning:
Faen steike til helvetes forbannade jævelskap.
But there are more creative cursers, of course. Good cursing is an art.
We gotta trust somebody or the whole “society” thing would be a waste.
The teaching I get from this is: Dont let Meta dictate the protocol. As soon as they become incompatible, let them stay incompatible until they follow. And be happy with the users who were smart enough to stay with the reliable platform.
People like that has always existed. We just didn’t give them media coverage.
Must be sad to be a crazy scientists today. “They laughed at me and called me crazy for thinking the moon is made of cheese? They’ll pa…” “No actually you got like 150 followers on Bird-app who agree.” It just isn’t the same. 🙄
This is probably very unlikely and I got no idea what I’m talking about: But what if feeding it even small amounts of its own content, text produced by a chatgpt instance, poisons it? That it gets confused from being fed text that adheres perfectly to its own rules, and locks that text down as perfect and not needing small variations.
I remember some article warning about this in a big scale, and I’m thinking why must it be big? If its only a probability tree, even small changes to the probability would cause issues further up the branches.
But blind speculation.