• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle





  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlOopsy daisies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think you’re arguing in good faith. There were more countries involved in WW2 than Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union but, as I said, I’m not an expert and I don’t expect people to be.

    It was a mistake on the part of the speaker, he owned it, and then the government apologized. Case closed. Don’t be a partisan hack.


  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlOopsy daisies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes let everyone, despite everything else going on at the time, pause in the moment to recall the finer points of WW2 geopolitics because everyone obviously has all those facts at the forefront of their mind at all times.

    List of people who clapped: literally everyone.

    I watched at home and didn’t clue in and I didn’t have cameras pointing at me documenting an internationally significant diplomatic event.

    This is not the own you think it is.


  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlOopsy daisies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could just be an honest mistake, but it doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be held accountable and I’m glad he has been. If I read the headline correctly I think the PM has also made a formal apology on behalf of the Canadian government as well but someone feel free to correct me on that because I didn’t quite get to reading the article.

    I think the Speaker’s riding is North Bay? The way a lot of small towns / northern cities work is someone tells you “oh I know him he’s a good guy” and you just kind of take it at face value until you find out otherwise.

    Now that’s not the way international protocol should work, obviously, and of course the Russians are going to use it.

    I don’t necessarily believe he was “put up to it” because the simplest explanation is just Northern Ontario word of mouth gone awry and applied to an international diplomatic event where it absolutely should have been fact checked. If I recall correctly, the Speaker said it was a last minute decision.

    I have a contact in the house so I can update if I hear any whisperings. My question is: is the Chief of Protocol responsible for reviewing the Speaker’s remarks. The answer could quite conceivably be no, and if so I think that process should be reviewed.


  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlOopsy daisies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s not the context though and misrepresents the situation.

    The Speaker of the House invited this guy because he knew of him from his riding. Without doing research or looking further into the circumstances of this individual’s service, the speaker made the decision to recognize this individual.

    This has nothing to do with the PM. It’s the speaker and he resigned.

    It’s pretty disgusting that people try to twist this into a partisan issue so they can dig at the PM. It’s disingenuous and kind of shitty to misrepresent this situation tbh.