Probably. But maybe someone will see it who has an open mind and didn’t know this.

Currently 18.75% of the world population lives in a communist country. (China, Vietnam, The DPRK, Laos, and Cuba.)

Shall we compare how many people have died to preventable causes in these countries in the last 10 years to the United States alone? Which has a vastly smaller populaton? Take covid for example.

China: 13,524 confirmed COVID deaths. Vietnam: 43,383 confirmed COVID deaths. North Korea (DPRK): 0 reported confirmed COVID deaths (no official reporting to WHO). Laos: 4,327 confirmed COVID deaths. Cuba: 11,777 confirmed COVID deaths. United States: 1,191,000 confirmed COVID deaths. (Accusations of underreporting and categorizing them as “pneumonia” in some states to improve numbers.)

It’s not even fucking close. The US by comparison is around 4% of the world population. So even with 6x more people to protect, much less funds and resources to do so, and a geographic disadvantage (The US has 2 oceans next to it to make controlling movement easier), the US let hundreds of thousands of its own people die. Simply because maintaining commerce and profit margins was more important than protecting its people.

I’m curious what you even think democracy is? Like what is more democratic vs less democratic? It’s kind of a strange word. Like to me democracy would be the idea that a government should generally do as its people desire. There can be many ways this is accomplished. I think we all agree on that. Elections vary in how they function country to country. The mechanics of them that is.

To me though I don’t really see the issue with measuring it based on how the people in that country feel about it. If the idea of democracy is that those very people should have their views represented, then is them feeling as if their views are represented not evidence of a more democratic outcome?

Look at it in the reverse. Would you make the arguement for example: “Well yes Country B’s people generally feel as if their country is less democratic, but they simply do not know what they are talking about. The democratic process is doing a great job of representing their views. Even if they do not think so.”

It’s a bit contradictory isn’t it? Unless you would have some other definition of democracy, which is why I asked that earlier in my reply. Maybe it would make more sense to me if you explained what you see democracy as.

Sadly this headline is not entirely accurate. What the amendment does is it bans recipients of federal highway funds from using the readers for anything other than toll collection. I think anyone who keeps up with how surveillance works these day’s can guess what the result will be.

Private companies will operate the cameras and sell the surveillance data back to the police. Since private companies do not need federal highway funds it won’t effect them. Massive loophole.

It is already common for Flock Cameras for example to be private. Stores will buy them and install them. It’s just more privitization of surveillance. There will still be license plate readers everywhere.