• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle




  • KRAW@linux.communitytoLinux@lemmy.ml•Kitty 0.50
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, after I saw this, I decided to look for alternatives that fit my use case and failed. All I want is a terminal where I can create splits and tabs in the same cwd as the current terminal even on a remote machine. I frequently want to create ad-hoc splits when working on a remote server. In kitty I can do this with a simply keystroke without any custom code or configuration, so long as I am using the ssh kitten. Are there any other terminals that do this? Bonus points if it implements kitty image protocol, which is used in a neovim plugin I use.




  • No, I think oil evaporates/boils at very high temperatures (think of how deep-frying is done at 325+ degrees). I think the oil on the surface of the bean in facts makes an oilier cup, based on my anecdotal evidence. You could do an experiment with a greasy and non-greasy dark roast and see which roast produces an oilier/fuller brew.


  • I’m not sure I follow what you mean by less oily. Dark roast beans are more likely to have oil on the surface. The oils are also generally something dark roast lovers try to retain in the brew, which is why a french press or a metal filter are good options for something like a french roast.

    I think the oils add more body to the brew, which may affect how you perceive the flavor. This is also why people like light roasts through paper filters to achieve a more “clean” cup.





  • I certainly don’t disagree with the points made in the video. It in fact points out something related to what I’m saying. He states he notices that people that claim something is not art are often gatekeeping something from becoming “elevated.” I’m extending the converse argument: many people trying to claim something is art are trying to elevate it to a new status.

    My problem with calling programming art is not that I don’t think programming is art, but rather that I think that label is not useful in this context. Programming is something that is very much valued without that label. Thus adding the label is just an attempt to tack on unneeded elevation to the craft. In some ways the video supports my viewpoint. The debate over what is art is a bit tired. It’s worth having, but personally I don’t think it is needed in this case.


  • I honestly think trying to define programming as art is just an attempt to unnecessarily elevate it. Programming is utilitarian. It is meant for a specific practical purpose. It does not reveal a shared human experience the way a movie, book, or game does. I have no need to convince myself, a professional software engineer of this because I am perfectly happy accepting that what I do is useful and do not need to try to put myself in a category with artists.

    All the author is saying is that people enjoy programming. I also enjoy eating. Is that an art? I even have my own “eating style” in that I like to eat food in specific order, combine two items into one bite, the way I build a bite, etc. But I’d never try to elevate it because I’m a normal person who doesn’t waste brainpower trying to make myself feel special.





  • Just fyi, I tried one your instance. Searched a user, clicked a result, and got an error.

    Error
    
    ./app.lua:134: attempt to concatenate field 'username' (a nil value)
    
    Traceback
    
    stack traceback:
    	./app.lua:134: in function 'handler'
    	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:185: in function 'resolve'
    	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:216: in function <...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214>
    	[C]: in function 'xpcall'
    	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214: in function 'dispatch'
    	/apps/kittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/nginx.lua:231: in function 'serve'
    	content_by_lua(nginx.conf.compiled:92):2: in main chunk
    

  • KRAW@linux.communitytoLinux@lemmy.ml•Do you use vim?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I use helix part-time but am forced to go back to neovim a majority of the time for a few reasons:

    1. no persistent undo
    2. no ctags and cscope (some C/C++ projects don’t work well with clangd)
    3. niche plugins (e.g. I just found a neovim plugin that gives me a way to run ipynb files in-editor)

    If 1 and 2 got fixed, I’d be a full time helix user