Cyber security specialist.
Perpetual blue team botherer and a glorified network janitor.
Specialty coffee addict.
Slow regard of silent things.
Trying to leave it better than I found it.

Mastodon: @0xtero

  • 0 Posts
  • 46 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle






  • 0xtero@kbin.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Why spend the money up front? That’s just bad business.

    Yeah agreed. They’re building a multi-million dollar social network - why spend all that money up front when they could have just installed small anonymous Pleroma on Raspberry Pi for under 100 bucks if they’d wanted to mine our data.

    I don’t think fedi is their “target”.




  • 0xtero@kbin.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    doesn’t mean we have to hand it to them on a silverplatter and allow them to scrape it legally

    They could have just set up a simple Pleroma on Raspberry Pi and it would have been just as “legal” as any other instance. You’d need to turn on AUTHORIZED_FETCH and set up authentication on the Mastodon API, otherwise everything is public and unauthenticated (even if the instance is suspended/defederated).

    But if enough instances say no, that means they are not welcome. Democracy and all

    mastodon.social has already said yes. So have all the other big instances. Most of them have said “we’ll wait and see”. So democracy served I guess

    And the last point is the dumbest: Threads will just include a revenue sharing model like Youtube does

    Yeah, maybe. Who knows. I’ll deal with it when it happens rather than knee-jerk years in advance. Threads has a long way to go, it’s missing a lot of features to put it on par with their other commercial competitors, so I think they’re going to be busy doing other things.


  • 0xtero@kbin.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yeah, that’s pretty much my take as well.

    All the “but muh datas” pearl clutching is just annoying and frankly, ridiculous. If they wanted to mine us, they already would have. They’re probably doing it as we speak. They didn’t have to create a multi-million social network for it. A raspberry pi on someones desk would have sufficed. Fedi doesn’t have any (/very much) privacy.

    They’re doing this to escape the wrath of EU privacy watchdogs. They were already fined for $1.3bn and more is coming. Running their Twitter killer on interoperable protocol is nice, because it’s free and they get to point at W3C and say they’re LIKE TOTALLY supporting data portability. Why would they “extend and extinguish” that? It’s their alibi.

    I don’t like Meta. It’s a shit company ran by shit people. I hope they burn in hell.
    But I can’t really get my panties in a twist about threads.net existing.

    I’ll get angry if they somehow figure out to push ads to my face.

    But for now. Maybe I’ll block it. Maybe I won’t. We’ll see.