Sorry for the shit image quality but here’s another ad by the same company for a better idea of it
Flew over the may day rally in San Francisco.
They’re dabbing on us
/- Matt christman
Sorry for the shit image quality but here’s another ad by the same company for a better idea of it
Flew over the may day rally in San Francisco.
They’re dabbing on us
/- Matt christman
Large aircraft can perform complex routes by autopilot.
What you’re saying is that the plane is still being piloted by a human. Not autopilot, and certainly not autopilot guided by AI.
Drones can do that stuff, though.
The pilot makes adjustment, most of the flight is done automatically.
It’s like farmers equipment, there’s still a driver even though he can nod off and nothing will go wrong. And if it does, alarms go off.
And how complex is complex? They can make prescribed turns and adjustments, but not what you are suggesting. Got a link or something? And funnily enough, those would be electronic systems. Not the wholly hydraulic like you were originally talking about.
Do you have a point you want to stick to? Or you just throwing whatever comes to your mind out? Maybe google some of this first? It’s all readily available online.
I really don’t care, I was just saying what crossed my mind
So you just make up an entirely fake system and argue that’s how stuff works in real life?
That’s not how people have conversations dude.
No more than you did. And you moved the goalposts a couple of times there.
I’m still certain that that plane doesn’t have an autopilot … even one taken from a tractor.
Pardon?
Just because you incorrectly assumed that an autopilot gives full autonomous control doesn’t mean the other user moved any goalposts.
Also,Cessna has autopilot, this could have been easily verified by you by doing a few seconds of research.
Because the point of the conversation was that a human was ko longer needed
Where? The original comment specified most. So it sounds like they understand an operator still does turns and other maneuvers.