I’m… I’m not sure that’s the flex you think it is.
I think it’s mostly a shitpost lol
White shitpost?
It just bothers me that “master” branch is a misnomer. It’s a hold over from CVS/SVN where there was actually a central authoritative branch. I’m not necessary saying the other reasons don’t have merit, as well.
trunk?
I always rename it to “dev.” Hard to have any problems or confusion with that
dev is confusing it implies it’s not the stable branch, no? Or was the master branch never stable for you?
I use master and apprentice. Always two there are, no more, no less.
Only a sith deals in absolutes, I will do what I must.
I think will actually start using this “master” and “apprentice” now. Love it lol
So that’s why Sith were considered evil
Why isn’t there a journeyman Sith though?
I prefer master exactly for that reason
::sigh:: This is the correct answer for a buttplug.io based workflow.
What are you doing step-branch?
I dislike master because main is shorter and faster to type
doesn’t matter:
maTABSome newbie at project: git checkout -b main_problem_task123
Someone suggested queen and worker. Luffy and then branches named after crew members also seemed nice. Another suggested dom and sub. Leader and cultist were other suggestions. For any StarCraft mod it should be Kerrigan and Raynor, or OverMind and Zerg, or for the later stages Amon and Protoss.
I love all those suggestions. Keeps things interesting and conveys the same thing.
Treat branches like Chinese dynasties. The mainline branch is the one having the mandate of heaven.
And they tend to fracture and rejoin seemingly at random, but with certain regularity
I think ‘master’ is fine for the master branch. It’s a master copy of the codebase.
I think ‘main’ is fine for the main branch. It’s the main branch of the repo.
I use ‘main’ at work cos that’s what my git client defaults to. I use ‘master’ at home because that’s what my git client defaults to. 🤷♂️
